ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2595|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助逻辑大全一题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-4-24 17:35:41 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
大全-A-17.With Proposition 13, if you bought your house 11 years ago for $75,000, your property tax would be approximately $914 a year (1 percent of $75,000 increased by 2 percent each year for 11 years); and if your neighbor bought an identical house next door to you for $200,000 this year, his tax would be $2,000 (1 percent of $200,000). Without Proposition 13, both you and your neighbor would pay $6,000 a year in property taxes (3 percent of $200,000).

Which of the following is the conclusion for which the author most likely is arguing in the passage above?

(A) Proposition 13 is unconstitutional because it imposes an unequal tax on properties of equal value.

(B) If Proposition 13 is repealed, every homeowner is likely to experience a substantial increase in property taxes.

(C) By preventing inflation from driving up property values, Proposition 13 has saved homeowners thousands of dollars in property taxes.

(D) If Proposition 13 is not repealed, identical properties will continue to be taxed at different rates.B

(E) Proposition 13 has benefited some homeowners more than others.

给个思路吧,为什么就是B了呢
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-4-26 13:12:05 | 只看该作者
就是B,有了PROPOSTION 13,整个税费降低,没它,税费很可怕
板凳
发表于 2010-5-4 14:19:02 | 只看该作者
E呢?
地板
发表于 2011-5-6 13:01:53 | 只看该作者
那E为什么不对啊
5#
发表于 2011-5-6 14:26:10 | 只看该作者
E中的the others没有提到啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 20:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部