[求助]大全303（OG220）

LES

220. For almost a hundred years after having its beginning in 1788, England exiled some 160,000 criminals to Australia.
(A) For almost a hundred years after having its beginning in 1788,
(B) Beginning in 1788 for a period of a hundred years,
(C) Beginning a period of almost a hundred years, in 1788,
(D) During a hundred years, a period beginning in 1788,（E）
(E) Over a period of a hundred years beginning in 1788,

OG explanation: Choice D is awkward and unidiomatic, and nonsensically suggests that a hundred years is defined as a period beginning in 1788. Precise and idiomatically phrased, choice E is best.
为什么这里不可以理解为是在describe，描述，a hundred year 呢？谢谢！

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-4-6 19:15:33编辑过]

tianwan

逗号隔开，非限制修饰。

LES

Oh, 明白了！谢谢tianwan！！！

我爱宝宝

即使是defined而不是describe, a hundred years=a period , beginning in 1788修饰a period =修饰a hundred years，那又

会产生什么歧义呢？

请nn指点。

我爱宝宝

想明白了，,就是defined的原因。

davidcopper

以下是引用tianwan在2004-4-6 20:39:00的发言：

逗号隔开，非限制修饰。

那又如何呢?非限制定语从句修饰普遍的性质,有定义的意味,同位语也是这样吗,没有从语法书中找到答案,请指教,谢谢!

LES

(D) During a hundred years, a period beginning in 1788,

非限制性修饰就是补充说明，解释，不起到限定的作用，那么 a hundred years = a period beginning in 1788，显然逻辑错误。

(E) Over a period of a hundred years beginning in 1788,

而限制性修饰有限定的作用，如E选项就限定说明是从1788年开始的100年，而不是其它时段的一百年。

jones79

还想在问问各位nn，为什么在我的印象里现在分词相当于非限制性定语从句，并非表示限制的意思

在og1就体现的很清楚，可本题beginning毫无疑问是在修饰years，而且是限制修饰，这到底是怎么回事，清大伙帮我看看

1.  The Wallerstein study indicates that even after a decade young men and women still experience some of the effects of a divorce occurring when a child.

(A)  occurring when a child

(B)  occurring when children

(C)  that occurred when a child

(D)  that occurred when they were children

(E)   that has occurred as each was a child

薰衣紫草

分词前面有逗号, 就是非限定性修饰; 前边没有逗号才是限定性修饰.

258. The British sociologist and activist Barbara Wootton once noted as a humorous example of income maldistribution that the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo was earning annually exactly what she then earned as director of adult education for London.

(A) that the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo was earning

(B) that the elephant, giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo, had been earning

(C) that there was an elephant giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo, and it earned

(D) the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo and was earning（A）

(E) the elephant giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo and that it earned

In B, the structure of noted... that the elephant, giving rides..., had been earning falsely implies that the reader already knows about the elephant—that is, that the existence of this particular elephant is not new information.

jones79

以下是引用薰衣紫草在2005-5-6 0:26:00的发言：

分词前面有逗号, 就是非限定性修饰; 前边没有逗号才是限定性修饰.

258. The British sociologist and activist Barbara Wootton once noted as a humorous example of income maldistribution that the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo was earning annually exactly what she then earned as director of adult education for London.

(A) that the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo was earning

(B) that the elephant, giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo, had been earning

(C) that there was an elephant giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo, and it earned

(D) the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo and was earning（A）

(E) the elephant giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo and that it earned

In B, the structure of noted... that the elephant, giving rides..., had been earning falsely implies that the reader already knows about the elephant—that is, that the existence of this particular elephant is not new information.

258题里有关于非限定的解释么，我怎么没看到,b解释只是强调时态，并没有指出限定和非限定的区别，也就是部分与整体的概念，不知道真么说对不对，请nn帮我在看看吧

还有og1，是不是也涉及到分时和定语从句修饰的区别呢，还是说这里都可以用