正式打算转商学院的PhD了

bernanke

I should add "in recent years". My fault.

没看出来怎么能支持你的结论：“Chinese job market stars in finance and accounting are all from traditional background”

-- by 会员 xiaopanghu (2010/3/18 13:30:11)

bernanke

"简单说说Business School Chinese 牛finance和accounting faculty的background trend change吧", This is the complete title.

我也没看出来啊，这篇文章就分析了一下每个人做什么方面，虽然我finance一个门外汉，但是这些论据没法佐证你的结论，“Chinese job market stars in finance and accounting are all from traditional background”

按照你那篇在mitbbs上面的文章的标题“简单说说Business School Chinese 牛finance和accounting facu”
你上来第一段就说了几个物理的，而且说他们很牛，也就是说你承认他们是 job market stars？那他们的background呢？

不过分析倒是不错，我反正不申请finance，也算长点见识。

-- by 会员 martinwang83 (2010/3/18 13:34:52)

xiaopanghu

我说的是levitt他们的paper，不是你在mitbbs发的文章，你总部能用你自己的文章证明的结论正确把

martinwang83

"简单说说Business School Chinese 牛finance和accounting faculty的background trend change吧", This is the complete title.

我也没看出来啊，这篇文章就分析了一下每个人做什么方面，虽然我finance一个门外汉，但是这些论据没法佐证你的结论，“Chinese job market stars in finance and accounting are all from traditional background”

按照你那篇在mitbbs上面的文章的标题“简单说说Business School Chinese 牛finance和accounting facu”
你上来第一段就说了几个物理的，而且说他们很牛，也就是说你承认他们是 job market stars？那他们的background呢？

不过分析倒是不错，我反正不申请finance，也算长点见识。

-- by 会员 martinwang83 (2010/3/18 13:34:52)

-- by 会员 bernanke (2010/3/18 13:43:35)

谢谢，少看了下面的，哈哈，顶不住了，睡觉去了，明天继续看讨论的内容。

bernanke

People ask for example and I give examples.

People ask for statistics and I showed the paper as well as the data source used by the paper.

The next step is to ask the authors for the data source and do some additional test for the background check. But we can use the logic: Athey et. al. (2007) showed that students' first year performance as well as their undergraduate institutions predict their future placement, i.e., who are job market stars. In their research all foreign institutions are treated as the same, i.e., all Chinese students are treated as graduating from the same institution. Therefore, the only relevant variable is the first year performance and if we can show a positive correlation between first-year performance and past background, end of the story. However, it is very hard to get this data so we need to form conjecture and my conjecture is that it should be positively correlated, as first-year micro and macro would be very hard to even get into without a solid training in at least intermediate level micro and macro.

And if you want statistics for finance and accounting, check all Chinese professors in top 20 finance and accounting programs and check their background. I am pretty sure 90% if not 100% of them are from econ, finance and accounting field. I checked them at times but this data can definitely be hand-collected and I guess the result should be very obvious.

我说的是levitt他们的paper，不是你在mitbbs发的文章，你总部能用你自己的文章证明的结论正确把

-- by 会员 xiaopanghu (2010/3/18 13:45:54)

xiaopanghu

说了半天全市你自己conjecture，那就请不要上来就用statistics。

desert2009

you got be kidding us. 1st year macro and micro courses are not a big deal for people with scientific background, provided they are good at what they are doing. They can easily make up the economic background via personal reading. You will find that out If you have taken any serious econ courses.

desert2009

bernanke, if you have any serious research experience, you will understand that papers are not even close to the truth, rather, they just provide the authors' perspectives.

xiaopanghu

呵呵，levitt的paper就看一乐，啥truth不truth的