超级菜鸟Cocoabean静心修炼中

vincent0330

bean好久没来了....up 一下!!

mumuwa

豆豆最近还好吗? 一定是在埋头苦干呢八!

+ U A!

cocoabean

To flowerrainn:

I also very busy in dealing with a lot of stuffs in my home, such as prepare sth for the travel of LG's Chicago. haha, I refused to company with him  in order for my GMAT. And I need to spend some time to practice driving, since I have to get my driving licence ASAP to replace my passport which will be sent to the Embassy ASAP.

New life always is very busy but happy.

To cater:

I am very glad to discuss with you in any problems, and I also replied the question. I think it will be very helpful to refer to views from other guys. As you said, It really spend  a lot of time to review.

TO mom

Be careful, you know, it is very funny there is almost nobody to drink around me, even in the party. I know how you feel in the work. You should exercise drinking  in China, but more and more friends of mine refuse to drink in Beijing.

Thanks for your suggestions.I think it is very important to familar with the writting style of Math.

To vincent:

Thanks a lot, I am strugglling in the mess of RC, and it spend me a lot of time to review and follow the mind of ETS. I really hope it is deserved. how about you? when will you kill the test?

To all guys :

I have dicided to kill GMAT on 27th Aug, 2004, haha.........cheer for me!

of course, I will try my best, but i really worry about my reading speed which will influence all parts, especially CR, RC.

**How to improve the speed and skills in reading ASAP?

Many thanks! thanks MUMUWA, MoMo, 携隐MM, cater, miaoyin, vincent,....I  got a lot from your thoughts.

Buddies, add full oil............add full oil............add full oil............add full oil..........!

May GOD bless all of you!

cocoabean

以下是木木的阅读总结, 主要对这些词比较迷惑, 难道这三类词都是错误答案的标志?我觉得好多看上去都是中性的, 为什么是定性错误（名词）, 莫须有的、附加的、不符合原文的限制和修饰词（形容词/副词）：是说随意添加了与原文不一致的修饰词吧?词本身可以用于任何地方吧? 请MUMU指教!

翻起二遍阅读复习的笔记，来，大家一起复习一下主题题型：

正确选项的确认：

内容性：TS的同义替换重现，KW的确认；

写法性：写作方法、结构的重现、总结和描述；

目的性：写作意图

错误选项的排除（请注意以下选项中出现的错误的特征和方向）

*文中细节，非主题内容；*延伸性内容；*偏无反混

1。莫须有的、附加的、不符合原文的限制和修饰词（形容词/副词）：

new,well-known, alternative,controversial,best,only,all,unimportant,similar,specific,varous,innovative,further,recent,additional,certain,different,accepted,discarded,fundamental,unique,supporting,opposing,one/two/several等数词...

2。定性错误（名词）：

debate,method,exception,generalization,instance,counterexample,evidence,misconception,ambiguity,thesis,inconsistence,hypothesis,ideology...

3。写作技法描述错误(动词）：

question,argue,compare,present,restate,reinforce,contradict,qualify,summarize,recommand,resolve,reconcile,support,weigh,evaluate,demonstrate,account for,illustrate,propose,trace,outline,pose,dispute,introduce,contrast,refute,analyze,correct,critique,clarify,discredit,distinguish,challenge,chronicle,defend,amend,champion...

这些是我从几乎所有的主题题型的选项中摘出的，我的出发点是发现很多主题型题的选项的迷惑性/误导性在于这些词汇的差异，如：在KW的名词前加上不该加的修饰词（recent,further...)，或对整个文章大意总结上的偏差（是generalization还是罗列evidence？），或是文章写作方式的错误描述（要仔细琢磨作者是在qualify？reconcile？critique？还是compare？）我就是很多次被这些小细节给迷糊走了。

就算给大家提个醒，作主题题要仔细斟酌选项里的词汇（至少应该熟悉它们的意思，尤其是那些动词所惯常代表的写法），可以尽快排除，并防止落入陷阱！

mumuwa

以下是引用cocoabean在2004-7-24 21:12:00的发言：

以下是木木的阅读总结, 主要对这些词比较迷惑, 难道这三类词都是错误答案的标志?我觉得好多看上去都是中性的, 为什么是定性错误（名词）, 莫须有的、附加的、不符合原文的限制和修饰词（形容词/副词）：是说随意添加了与原文不一致的修饰词吧?词本身可以用于任何地方吧? 请MUMU指教!

这些词本身没有错误,只不过在选项中张冠李戴了, 就是我以前解释的意思:

我的出发点是发现很多主题型题的选项的迷惑性/误导性在于这些词汇的差异，如：在KW的名词前加上不该加的修饰词（recent,further...)，或对整个文章大意总结上的偏差（是generalization还是罗列evidence？），或是文章写作方式的错误描述（要仔细琢磨作者是在qualify？reconcile？critique？还是compare？）我就是很多次被这些小细节给迷糊走了。

还有,比如,问文章中一段的作用,本来是举例,你就不能误选为总结概括; 文章里提到的观点没有说是新观点或普遍观点,你选答案就应该避免有这样限定词的选项;文章说到一个观点,你就不能选复数,或"几个观点"的答案.就是这个意思.要准确选答案!

如果你看了OG的解释,会发现ETS对很多错误答案的解释都是这样的"the arthor does not mention......" "Although the argument mention...., it is not the main idea/focus of the passage" "The passage simply give discription about.... but not make comparison/conclusion/summary...."所以文章说了什么,为了什么,你要搞清楚,不要弄错!

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-7-24 23:38:35编辑过]

vincent0330

To vincent:
Thanks a lot, I am strugglling in the mess of RC, and it spend me a lot of time to review and follow the mind of ETS. I really hope it is deserved. how about you? when will you kill the test?

hay, bean, I decide to take test on Sep. 20......finally I decide the date though kinda late.

By getting those mumu's note, hope you get the essence of RC.

RC, like what mumu say, have to concentrate on every choices. after my second round review, I also got those feeling. every single choice have one or two treaky words to confuse you. some're easy; some're tough; but by reading carefully the OG explanation, you will get the feeling. Mumu's note is kinda of systematically organized. Following this mode, you will find the rule, and sometime you can resolve the problem without relocate the context. That indeed save the many time.

BTY, what time you gonna take test?? Good Luck!!

陌

豆豆，mumu的建议已经非常详细了，我也实在没什么能补充的了，仔细领会一下，肯定没有问题的。

还有就是谢谢豆豆对我的关心，我那天不是和同事而是和同学喝酒，4年没见过了，而且因为工作的关系想要见一面真的很难，所以大家都喝多了：）

不过还是要谢谢豆豆的关心！

豆豆加油！

cocoabean

谢谢娃, 狗狗, 陌, 字字箴言呀, 好好体会, 这两天有一点头绪了,

刚送走LG, 哈哈, 终于可以清净下来了, 不用天天抱着本本上窜下跳的躲避干扰了, 不过还是要好好表扬一下, 这些天LG几乎把所有的脏活, 累活都揽下了, 我唯一的工作就是每周化10hours 去 cook and cleaning. (也废了一天呀, 心疼...)还是单身宿舍好呀, 一个月不扫地也没人care, 怀念ing,...........^_^

这样的话,好好抓住这六天宝贵地时间消灭RC第三遍, (集中突破的第一遍, ) , 才完成1/3, 加油啊, 这几天把CR又给拉下了, 一周多没看了, 只是总结了一些GWD的错体, 每天6片,每天汇报工作进展, 大家监督豆豆啊!

恨自己第一遍的时候醒悟较晚, 只有一小半的文章看了OG, 其余都是看杨继, 还有昆松的录音,现在还得补齐,怎一个慢子了得, anyway, 开工了!

大家加油也! 看大家都进展的很不错了.

vincent0330

呵呵.....bean复习怎样??啥时杀敌??

加油加油!!

cocoabean

今天完成了OG20--25的总结, 文章比较短, 还不是那么费劲, 可是我什么时候才能挤出时间看我的CR呀?每天加速一点,现在对阅读有一点信心了, 谢谢大家这么长时间不厌其烦的指教!特别是我的木木娃!

看木木娃今天摇身一变成版主了, 什么版的呀?  反正大家更有福了!发现木木是小安大法的最好的实施者, 倡导者,普及者,

当然还有木氏独特的见解, 我现在开始准备木木语录了...哈哈

to 亲爱的木木: 收到信否?可明了豆豆的心意?

TOP10在敞开大门等着你呢?加油啊, 娃!

TO 狗狗: 上页有, 8.27不能再改了, 祝我好运哈, 是不是我也应该向狗狗一样闭关啃OG的说.

Questions

1.遇到RC里问题中 如: can most reasonably be concluded, can be inferred from 这样的问法, 大家是吧他们归为那种题型呀, 我把他们归为逻辑里的infer题, 不知对不对,

2.还有一种专门问单词的, 如OG18-108T的“understandable” (line 14), 一般应该归为那类呀, 我给他取了个新名字, 单词作用题, 不知可不可以?

3. 再问OG24的148T.估计是最简单的一篇, 上次全对, 今天还做错了一个,  

“preferable to victimizing other geographical areas by taking their jobs” 意思是: 它没有以expense of another的代价来advantage one local workforce.我也知道应该是这个意思, 可就是不明白这里的victimizing是什么意思?

不明白, victimizing不是牺牲, 使受害的意思吗? 使其它地区受害呀, 不知道这个否定词是怎么来得?

谢谢大家!