知道这道假设题的请进！prep1-121

aaapple

121. (32730-!-item-!-188;#058&006786)     (GWD 23-Q40)
假设
Political advocacy groups have begun touse information services to disseminate information that is then accessed bythe public via personal computer.  Since many groups are thus able to bypasstraditional news sources, whose reporting is selective, and to present theirpolitical views directly to the public, information services present a morebalanced picture of the complexities of political issues than any traditionalnews source presents.

Which of the following is an assumptionon which the argument above depends?


A. Information services are accessible to enoughpeople to ensure that political advocacy groups can use these services to reachas large a percentage of the public as they could through traditional newssources.

B. People could get a thorough understanding of aparticular political issue by sorting through information provided by severaltraditional news sources, each with differing editorial biases.
C. Information on political issues disseminatedthrough information services does not come almost entirely from advocacy groupsthat share a single bias.
D. Traditional news sources seldom report the viewsof political advocacy groups accurately.
E. Most people who get information on politicalissues from newspapers and other traditional news sources can readily identifythe editorial biases of those sources.
答案是C，但是A为什么不对呢？

lxw19

这道题的结论是“information services present a more balanced picture of the complexities of political issues than any traditional news source presents.”  也就是说之所以information services 比traditional 的更加好是因为它的透明度更加高了，在政治问题上人们更加自由了。。。

C中说的是那些通过information services 散播的消息不全是从有同样bias的advocacy groups 那里得出的，那么正好就排出了一种削弱原文的可能性

A中只是说有更多的人能够通过information services 得到news，但是就算再多的人得到他们的news， 如果news本身是biased， 那么再多的人也没用啊~~

aaapple

这道题的结论是“information services present a more balanced picture of the complexities of political issues than any traditional news source presents.”  也就是说之所以information services 比traditional 的更加好是因为它的透明度更加高了，在政治问题上人们更加自由了。。。

C中说的是那些通过information services 散播的消息不全是从有同样bias的advocacy groups 那里得出的，那么正好就排出了一种削弱原文的可能性

A中只是说有更多的人能够通过information services 得到news，但是就算再多的人得到他们的news， 如果news本身是biased， 那么再多的人也没用啊~~

-- by 会员 lxw19 (2010/3/8 16:19:34)

原来是当做透明度来理解！懂了，谢谢！！