ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2060|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12 48

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-2-8 01:21:58 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
OG11-50
If the county continues to collect residential trash at
current levels, landfills will soon be overflowing and
parkland will need to be used in order to create more
space. Charging each household a fee for each pound
of trash it puts out for collection will induce residents
to reduce the amount of trash they create; this charge
will therefore protect the remaining county parkland.

Which of the following is an assumption made in
drawing the conclusion above?
(A) Residents will reduce the amount of trash they
put out for collection by reducing the number
of products they buy.
(B) The collection fee will not significantly affect
the purchasing power of most residents, even if
their households do not reduce the amount of
trash they put out.
(C) The collection fee will not induce residents to
dump their trash in the parklands illegally.
(D) The beauty of county parkland is an important
issue for most of the county’s residents.
(E) Landfills outside the county’s borders could be
used as dumping sites for the county’s trash.

我看到有人说选C不选A的原因是因为:检验假设最好的方法就是取非,对A取非并不能削弱结论。
但是,我觉得,结论是因为有fee,大家减少了垃圾,所以parkland就保存下来了。对A取非是大家不会减少垃圾的数量。这不正好就削弱了结论吗?
那A哪里错了呢
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-9 18:21:05 | 只看该作者
哪位好心人帮我解答一下啊
板凳
发表于 2010-2-9 22:30:19 | 只看该作者
我理解下来,

A选项只是对原文里的 Charging each household a fee for each pound of trash it puts out for collection will induce residents to reduce the amount of trasg they create;这句话的补充而已,就是A只是这句话的原因而以,而并不是额外的assumption。貌似是多余的。
地板
发表于 2010-7-17 11:10:12 | 只看该作者
个人认为reducing the number of products they buy是无关内容
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-28 05:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部