ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Editorial:In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker's income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.

Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 12413|回复: 25
打印 上一主题 下一主题

TTGWD11-Q30(讨论过,但没人问过A)NN相助~~~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-1-20 20:39:22 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Q10:TTGWD11-Q30:

Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance.  To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply.  However, the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed.  Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.

Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?

A.      The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.

B.      Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.

C.      People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.

D.      The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.

E.       People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.

我刚开始选的A,后来虽然觉得C是正确的单还是想问问A,如果改成[bgcolor=#ffff00]employed individuals and their families.是不是就可以选了?[/bgcolor]

理解为:如果这些人去工作,虽然他们收入不会曾加但却可以减少他们家人的税收,所以也是有利益刺激的?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-20 22:05:04 | 只看该作者
自己up~~~help~~~~
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-21 16:32:42 | 只看该作者
没有人回答么????难道是我想的太多了????
地板
发表于 2010-1-22 01:43:05 | 只看该作者
关于A项的修改,英文部分好象缺少一些限制。中文理解了,同意楼主的思路。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-22 22:28:14 | 只看该作者
谢谢啦~~~总算听到一个赞同的声音~~呵呵
6#
发表于 2010-5-5 21:27:12 | 只看该作者
up
7#
发表于 2010-5-14 16:58:03 | 只看该作者
UP。A确实是一个问题啊。
8#
发表于 2010-5-14 17:04:00 | 只看该作者
我明白了!
大家仔细看,题目中说:In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance.  还说:the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance
也就是说,那些工资低于社保金的工作,会被补贴到和社保金一样的数量,A说不收税,但即使不收税,也不会让工资多余社保金吧!
那既然补贴完的钱和呆在家里拿社保的钱是一样的,何必还要工作呢?
9#
发表于 2010-5-15 21:51:49 | 只看该作者
我觉得答案是E

失业了 有政府补助金总量50$(比喻的拉)
去工作了  收入不高48$  政府再补助一点2$  总数还是50$

这样的话还去工作干吗?EDITORIAL 就conclusion that they have not fnancial incentive to go to work, remind uneployed.    所以要是weaked这个观点就选E?   我个人的看法    

觉得C是无关选项,A是迷惑选项      欢迎咋忌惮...

对了 说下A吧  注意看题了  gov. will not tax on the people who are unemployed, on the other hand, it means they will tax on the people who are employed yet receive lower pay and on the same time receive some gov. assistance. so正好符合了EDTORAL 的观点了,是加强.

欢迎仍鸡蛋
10#
发表于 2010-5-15 22:04:05 | 只看该作者
这题答案是什么???
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 06:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部