再问：og-77

zcx

前人讨论过这个问题，但是没有很明确答复，再问：d选项坐在什么地方？og的解释也不清楚，谢谢。

79. When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, "No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.

Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?

(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, "Yes"?

(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?

(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist’s suggestion that they are deaf?

(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?

(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

Since the question elicits a reply, the question was presumably heard, but presumably not by the part that is deaf.The explanation’s obvious weakness, therefore, is that it fails to indicate why the part that replies would reply as if it were the part that is deaf. Choice A points to this failure and is the best answer. Choice B does not challenge the explanation itself, but the need for an explanation in the first place. Choices C and D raise pertinent questions concerning the facts described, but do not address the proffered explanation of those facts. Choice E points to a question to which the attempted explanation gives rises, but does not challenge the dequacy of the explanation.

delldell

简单的说如果按照文中的解释那么应该有两种结果:


1. 没人回答


2. 回答YES

zcx

d选项不是正好说的不应该只有一个回答？我觉得这样点出了weakness呀

dansy

这题是问哪一个削弱了上述解释。答案必须和这个解释有关。


解释是说被催眠的人被分割了(字面看起来有点恐怖，呵呵)，“有了催眠效果认为自己是聋子”的那部分与“回答”的那部分分开了。答案D的确可以作为一个疑问，但是它与上述解释是不相关的，这么说吧，它没有指出解释中人被分割的精髓。OG里我记得还有几个类似的例子。选项与题干相关，看似正确，但一定要记得于结论密切相关。

zcx

谢谢

swlfx

谢谢。