ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Bank depositors in the United States are all financially protected against bank failure because the government insures all individuals' bank deposits.An economist argues that this insurance is partly responsible for the high rate of bank failures, since it removes from depositors any financial incentive to find out whether the bank that holds their money is secure against failure.If depositors were more selective.then banks would need to be secure in order to compete for depositors' money.

Which of he following, if true, most seriously weakens the economist s argument?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3559|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

old prep cr2-59

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-12-14 03:37:18 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
59.     (33759-!-item-!-188;#058&007597)



Bank depositors in the United States are all financially protected against bank failure because the government insures all individuals' bank deposits.  An economist argues that this insurance is partly responsible for the high rate of bank failures, since it removes from depositors any financial incentive to find out whether the bank that holds their money is secure against failure.  If depositors were more selective, then banks would need to be secure in order to compete for depositors' money.



Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the economist's argument?



(A) Before the government started to insure depositors against bank failure, there was a lower rate of bank failure than there is now.

(B) When the government did not insure deposits, frequent bank failures occurred as a result of depositors' fears of losing money in bank failures.

(C) Surveys show that a significant proportion of depositors are aware that their deposits are insured by the government.

(D) There is an upper limit on the amount of an individual's deposit that the government will insure, but very few individuals' deposits exceed this limit.

(E) The security of a bank against failure depends on the percentage of its assets that are loaned out and also on how much risk its loans involve.

注:正确答案是B。

请教:我觉得这道题应该选E。因为,问题问的是什么选项削弱了经济学家的argument。 而本题中经济学家的argument是:银行倒闭部分是因为政府的insure。E说明了银行倒闭的原因是它的assets,正好削弱了经济学家所说的银行倒闭是因为政府的insure。

非常希望大家能讨论这道题。谢谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2009-12-14 19:11:36 | 只看该作者
我认为经济学家argue的,即政府insure的是 individual deposit,而E所说的是围绕着银行资产的 loan 部分,正好是government insurance 没有cover的部分。所以起不到weaken的作用。
板凳
发表于 2009-12-14 19:17:29 | 只看该作者
补充其他几个选项的个人分析。
A是strengthen,没有政府介入之前反而更低的倒闭率,所以support了经济学家的看法。
B是weaken,一旦没有政府介入,银行倒闭得更多。所以support了government insurance的政策,即反对了经济学家的看法。
C提到了储户心理,但题干中并未对储户心理与银行倒闭之间的关系做出任何说明,所以无关
D提到了保险的上限,而仅能推导出大多数储户都被政府的保护政策所cover。同C,与倒闭之间的关系不明
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-14 01:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部