再次求救GWDTN24第五套 的一个题Q28

akatsuki09

Q28: GWD-2-10




Environmentalist:  The use of snowmobiles in the vast park north of Milville create sun acceptable levels of air pollution and should be banned.

Milville business spokesperson:  Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners to Milville  in winter months, to the great financial benefit of many local residents.  So, economics dictate that we put up with the pollution.

Environmentalist: I disagree:  A great many cross-country skiers are now kept from visiting Milville by the noise and pollution that snowmobiles generate.

Environmentalist responds to the business spokesperson by doing which of the following?



A.        Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome can derive from only one set of circumstances

B.        Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome

C.        Maintaining that the benefit that the spokesperson desires could be achieved in greater degree by a different means

D.      Claiming that the spokesperson is deliberately misrepresenting the environmentalist’s position in order to be better able to attack it

E.       Denying that an effect that the spokesperson presents as having benefited a certain group of people actually benefited those people

请问得出E这个结果的逻辑过程是怎么样的？

苏格拉底屠夫

这是一个that 引导的同位语从句

clumsy123

环境学家说哎呀你这个snowmobile搞得环境污染很严重啊，应该要禁止。
然后某个商业发言人反驳到，其实这个Snowmobiling 吸引了很多其他镇的居民来我们镇玩啊，给我们的居民创造了很多经济利益，所以从经济上来说，我们是可以忍受这个污染的。
然后环境学家指出，创造经济利益？P啦，现在很多其他镇的居民都因为这个snowmobile造成的污染不到我们镇来玩了！

发言人以Snowmobiling可以对当地居民创造经济利益作为依据来支持他的观点，然后环境学家就提出事实反驳发言人的证据。选E