ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1033|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]一道新东方的解释题!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-9-9 00:48:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]一道新东方的解释题!

Surveys show that every year only 10percent of cigarette smokes switch brands.Yet the manufacturers have been spending an amount of equal to 10 percent of their gross receipts on cigarette promotion in magazines.It follows from these figures that inducing cigarette smokes to switch brands did not pay,and that cigarette companies would have been no worse off economically if they had dropped their advertising.
Of the following,the best criticism of the condition that inducing cigarette smokes to switch brands did not pay is that the conclusion is based on 
(A)computing advertising costs as a percentage of gross receipts,not of overall costs.
(B)past patterns of smoking and may not carry over to the future
(C)the assumption that each smokers is loyal to a single brand of cigarette at any one time
(D)the assumption that manufacturer products only one brand of cigarette
(E)figures for the cigarette industry as a whole and may not hold for a particular company
答案是E。我的问题是,如果放到反对的题目里出,我一定会选E,但是这道题放到解释里出,我觉得C这个选项也是可以的,请NN指点我的错误!谢谢!!!【全打出来不容易,拜托了!】

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/9/9 0:53:48编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-11 03:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部