At present the Hollywood Restaurant
has only standard-height tables.
However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the
Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would
afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as
long as diners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating
with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.
The argument is vulnerable to criticism
on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that
(A) some celebrities come to the
Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they
were available
(B) the price of meals ordered by
celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any,
they spend lingering over their meals
(C) a customer of the Hollywood who
would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization
about lingering
(D) a restaurant's customers who spend
less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who
remain at their meals longer
(E) with enough tall tables to
accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there
would be no view except of other tall tables 题目是这样，正确答案是c，但是我怎么都看不懂啊，我总觉得d是正确的，有哪位大牛能帮忙给梳理下？万分感谢，万分感谢啊……
 | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2009-8-10 09:44:00
