请教GWD7-Q38

草木

Journalist:  Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron has long been popular in the state, and he has often talked about running for governor, but he has never run.  However, we have just learned that Bergeron has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy by submitting a detailed list of his current financial holdings to the election commission.  So, it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the journalist’s argument?

1. Has anybody else who has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for the upcoming election reported greater financial holdings than Bergeron?

2. Is submitting a list of holdings the only way to fulfill the election commission’s financial disclosure requirements?

3. Did the information recently obtained by the journalists come directly from the election commission?

4. Have Bergeron’s financial holdings increased in value in recent years?

5. Had Bergeron also fulfilled the financial disclosure requirements for candidacy before any previous gubernatorial elections?

为什么是E呢？B为什么不正确呢？实在是想不通啊！那位NN帮忙点化一下吧~

payo

原文 submit --> candidate

E. 过去有没有对candidacy submit过 肯定回答削弱原文 否定回答加强原文 正确

B. 是不是only way都和结论无关

感觉这题出的不好 过去不能推将来

melodyflying

Arnold Bergeron 都已经满足条件了

到底submitting a list of holdings 是不是满足条件的唯一方法已经不重要了 反正他都满足了啊

又不是题设说他没有满足

monkeymaru

Evaluation.

Situation：AB以前经常说要run for governor，但是没有。

                  最近AB向election commission发送了一个详细的financial holding list
Conclusion: 很有可能AB今年会是一个candidate

要评价的话有下面2个条件：

1-      是否填了这个financial disclosure requirement就是要成为candidate的可能条件；

2-      AB之前是否有过类似的举动。

选项B 说是否一个holding的list就是填financial disclosure requirement的唯一途径，无关。

paul880126

我先也选的B,后来发现应该错了.
我先是这样理解B的:是不是submitting a list of holdings 是election commission选择候选人的唯一标准?
但它实际上说的是:是不是submitting a list of holdings 是fulfill financial disclosure的唯一方法?
所以说B是错的.不知道LZ先是不是和我想法一样.

葛佳

是不是submitting a list of holdings 是election commission选择候选人的唯一标准?
但它实际上说的是:是不是submitting a list of holdings 是fulfill financial disclosure的唯一方法?
所以说B是错的.不知道LZ先是不是和我想法一样.

这个唯一标准 vs 唯一方法的理解还是不太明白。
是不是标准衡量：submitting a list of holdings
但是方法：通过这方式去达到作为candidate。

请高人指点

桃子教主

本题重点是以前和现在的比较，以前经常说要run for,但是没有。现在，发了个list,以前和现在的区别是什么？
文中并没有表明他以前是否也发此list
最近感觉G的逻辑不是想象中那么严密，它只是考虑一个点，如果你想的那点个GMAC想考察你的思路一致的话，就变的非常简单。G的逻辑和法学的逻辑还是差了很多。。。个人观点

caviar2004s

B.Is submitting a list of holdings the only way to fulfill the election commission’s financial disclosure requirements?
我試著翻譯b選項:是不是提交財物清單是唯一的方法以滿足選舉委員會對於財務揭露的規定
因此很明顯地,這個選項錯誤

电饭煲

其实这道题很简单，大家不要想那么多。问题的关键在与“this year”。文章的conclusion是“So, it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year.”，所以，要evaluate这个问题就要与往年对比。