ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2870|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论][求助]请教GWD-28-Q16(原来没有讨论过)--是不是太简单了啊

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-8-3 19:11:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论][求助]请教GWD-28-Q16(原来没有讨论过)--是不是太简单了啊

   GWD-28-Q16

Paper&rint is a chain of British stores selling magazines, books, and stationery products. In Britain, magazines’ retail prices are set by publishers, and the retailer’s share of a magazine’s retail price is 25 percent. Since Paper&rint’s margin on books and stationery products is much higher, the chain’s management plans to devote more of its stores’ shelf space to books and stationery products and reduce the number of magazine titles that its stores carry.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly argues that the plan, if put into effect, will not increase Paper&rint’s profits?

A: Recently magazine publishers, seeking to increase share in competitive sectors of the market, have been competitively cutting the retail prices of some of the largest circulation magazines.

B: In market research surveys, few consumers identify Paper&rint as a book or stationery store but many recognize and value the broad range of magazines it carries.

C: The publisher’s share of a magazine’s retail price is 50 percent, and the publisher also retains all of the magazine’s advertising revenue.

D: Consumers who subscribe to a magazine generally pay less per issue than they would if they bought the magazine through a retail outlet such as Paper&rint.

E: Some of Paper& Print’s locations are in small towns and represent the only retail outlet for books within the community.

答案是B,看上去很模糊,似乎是有削弱但是不准确啊。

题目的论点是 increase Paper&rint’s profits,B就算是能够削弱也应该也很多假设在里面的吧?

没有这些假设和常识是不能解出这个题目的,GWD的题目是不是都是这个味道啊(比如说GWD-21-Q30GWD-28-Q17)。

如果是,那么是不是我的思路错了(过于limited了),需要重新调整?


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/8/3 22:18:48编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-3 20:23:00 | 只看该作者

怎么沉得这么快,自己来顶一下先。等人进来帮忙

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-4 01:14:00 | 只看该作者

继续等人来救我

地板
发表于 2009-8-4 21:28:00 | 只看该作者
up
5#
发表于 2009-8-4 22:45:00 | 只看该作者

Since Paper&rint’s margin on books and stationery products is much higher,但是如果买的人少的话还是不能increase its profits 啊,也就是说 few consumers identify Paper&rint as a book or stationery store but many recognize and value the broad range of magazines it carries.那么就算他放再多的books and stationery products没人买,profits也不会提高啊

不知道这么想对不对。。。

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-7 14:48:00 | 只看该作者
楼上的MM说得有道理,我主要是对这句话few consumers identify Paper&rint as
a book or stationery store but many recognize and value the broad range
of magazines it carries.的含义不是很了解. 是不是说
consumers认为它是卖杂志的不是买书的,所以不管它是否增加再多的books and stationery products也不会有更多的人去买?这里是不是有个假设,consumers买的大都是自己认识或了解的出版社发行的书刊杂志?

谢谢,谢谢
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-7 14:55:00 | 只看该作者
再比如说
    


                    
GWD-
21-Q30


    

In the past, most
children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with
runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular;
they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern
that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the
number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it
was ten years ago.


    

 


    

Which of the
following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the
evidence cited?


    

 


    

A.    
A few
children still use traditional wooden sleds.


    

B.    
Very
few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.


    

C.    
Plastic
sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds
can.


    

D.    
Most
sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another
sled.

   E.

Because the traditional
wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled
can result in several children being injured.
答案C.是否有隐含假设
Plastic
sleds被广泛使用所以使用的人多.



    

 
GWD-
28-Q17


    

In the nation of Partoria, large trucks
currently account for 6 percent of miles driven on Partoria’s roads but are
involved in 12 percent of all highway fatalities. The very largest trucks –
those with three trailers – had less than a third of the accident rate of
single- and double-trailer trucks. Clearly, therefore, one way for Partoria to
reduce highway deaths would be to require shippers to increase their use of
triple-trailer trucks.


    

Which of the following, if true, most
seriously weakens the argument?


    

A: Partorian trucking companies have so far
used triple-trailer trucks on lightly traveled sections of major highways only.


    

B: No matter what changes Partoria makes in
the regulation of trucking, it will have to keep some smaller roads off-limits
to all large trucks.


    

C: Very few fatal collisions involving
trucks in Partoria are collisions between two trucks.


    

D: In Partoria, the safety record of the
trucking industry as a whole has improved slightly over the past ten years.


    

E: In Partoria, the maximum legal payload
of a triple-trailer truck is less than three times the maximum legal payload of
the largest of the single-trailer trucks



答案A,是否也有隐含假设同样的汽车用在 lightly traveled sections of major highways上的就比其他路面上的事故率低?

求助,求助.sos.........

8#
发表于 2009-9-20 00:25:00 | 只看该作者
关于28套题的第17题,A答案也许并不完美(GMAT官方指南也说所有题的答案都是最好的但未必是完美的),但反映出了GMAT逻辑削弱题的一种答案类型——他因导致。
如原文逻辑为A推出B,削弱题正确答案可以是C推出B,即通过指出B的原因不是A而是C,从而否定AB间的逻辑关系……
本题要削弱的结论运用的假设是triple-trailer trucks本身的安全性使得其事故率比其它种类的truck低,而A选项指出事故率是另有他因,因此削弱了命题……
9#
发表于 2009-9-20 11:04:00 | 只看该作者
28-Q16. 没有客户买主,岂能获得利润。plan is not a good idea. B is right
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 01:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部