ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2092|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]陈向东逻辑 反对题52

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-3-1 13:26:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]陈向东逻辑 反对题52

52 As a promotional experiment, Omega Company distributed four million catalogs. In one of the two versions of the catalog, the description of each for sale mentioned a “Made by Hand” label. The number of purchases from consumers receiving that catalog was twenty percent greater than the number of purchases from consumers receiving a catalog that did not mention the label. Thus, the mention of label stimulated sales.


Which of the following, if true, could best be used to challenge the conclusion drawn above?


(A)         Consumers receiving the catalog mentioning the label had previously purchased items from Omega Company by mail but consumers receiving the other catalog had not.


答案A


为什么A是答案?是如何得出这个答案的呢?

沙发
发表于 2004-3-1 14:21:00 | 只看该作者

52 As a promotional experiment, Omega Company distributed four million catalogs(background). In one of the two versions of the catalog, the description of each for sale mentioned a “Made by Hand” label(evidence1). The number of purchases from consumers receiving that catalog was twenty percent greater than the number of purchases from consumers receiving a catalog that did not mention the label(evidence2). Thus, the mention of label stimulated sales(conclusion).


Logic layout: evidence2->conclusion.


Choice A indicates essential difference of the consumers who recieve the 2 catalogs respectively, consequently, the argument cannot explain evidence2 is caused by label rather than by the essential difference between 2 group of consumers.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-2-6 01:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部