By narrowing his focus to village institutions and ignoring these critical differences, which studies by Greven, Demos, and Lockridge have shown to be so important, Allen has created a somewhat distorted picture of reality. 这句话 我有个小更正,毕竟1楼是为了说明整个文章的意思,对这个小细节没有在意。不应该翻译成 “G,D,L指出。。。。,”
What conclusion can be drawn, for example, from Allen's discovery that Puritan clergy who had come to the colonies from East Anglia were one-third to one-half as likely to return to England by 1660 as were Puritan ministers from western and northern England? We are not told in what way, if at all, this discovery illuminates historical understanding. 这段话什么意思呢??
What conclusion can be drawn, for example, from Allen's discovery that Puritan clergy who had come to the colonies from East Anglia were one-third to one-half as likely to return to England by 1660 as were Puritan ministers from western and northern England? We are not told in what way, if at all, this discovery illuminates historical understanding
What conclusion can be drawn, for example, from Allen's discovery that Puritan clergy who had come to the colonies from East Anglia were one-third to one-half as likely to return to England by 1660 as were Puritan ministers from western and northern England? Studies of local history have enormously expanded our horizons, but it is a mistake for their authors to conclude that village institutions are all that mattered, simply because their functions are all that the records of village institutions reveal.
19,从作者的态度观点来看,对这个discovery的态度肯定是否定的,排除ACE.
What conclusion can be drawn, from Allen's discovery that ( Puritan clergy [who had come to the colonies from East Anglia] were one-third to one-half as likely to return to England by 1660 as were Puritan ministers from western and northern England ) ?这个句子是 个疑问句,what不是主语从句,what conclusion can be drawn from A’s discovery? We are not told in what way, if at all, this discovery illuminated historical understanding.
从A的发现中我们可以得出什么结论?,A的发现就是圆括号的一堆同位语从句中的东西。我们不知道用什么方法,如果我们知道用什么方法了,这个发现 就可以。。。
总结一下就是,我们知道发现的内容,圆括号,我们不知道从发现中可以得出什么结论,我们也不知道用什么方法可以得出这些结论。这个发现是个无法解释的,孤立的事实。无法解释,是因为不知道能得出啥结论。用什么方法。事实,是因为,作者并没有对发现内容本身做评价,或者否定,只是 说这个发现是孤立的,从中没办法延伸 出其他结论。