|
GWD7-Q38: Journalist: Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron has long been popular in the state, and he has often talked about running for governor, but he has never run. However, we have just learned that Bergeron has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy by submitting a detailed list of his current financial holdings to the election commission. So, it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year. The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the journalist’s argument? A. Has anybody else who has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for the upcoming election reported greater financial holdings than Bergeron? B. Is submitting a list of holdings the only way to fulfill the election commission’s financial disclosure requirements?（是only way，不一定说明要参加选举；不是only way,不能说明不是要参加选举） C. Did the information recently obtained by the journalists come directly from the election commission? D. Have Bergeron’s financial holdings increased in value in recent years? E. Had Bergeron also fulfilled the financial disclosure requirements for candidacy before any previous gubernatorial elections?（因为他以前从没run过，所以可以根据这个评断）
GWD17-Q9:
（CD-9 Q10）Press Secretary: Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts. But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics. Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends? A. Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. B. The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party. C. The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future. D. The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties. E. Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects. GWD7的B选项和GWD17的A选项很相似，上一题我想通为什么错了，这题的A选项怎么错了？对A取非，cancelling highway projects是出于partisan politics的唯一途径，那不就是说明president's choice is motivated by partisan politics吗？ | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2009-5-16 21:40:00
楼主
