求这道JJ的CR题答案呀。。

bollenyyy

谢谢拉！！

(2)环境保护VS经济增长

逻辑在复习资料里出现过的那题是：关于环境保护与经济增长的的关系，我想很多人在资料中碰到过这题

Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?

According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth.  This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth.  This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.

A	those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
B	even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
C	many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
D	after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
E	even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth

scutpigus

A ?

is it strict regulations = less growth?

Undermined by the fact: strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth

Anwer A offers an explanation for the fact that strictest regulations have highest growth

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-8 15:16:59编辑过]

alpes2009

A

这个GWD里面的题目,具体哪题记不清了.

环境管控严格的城市也是经济增长最快的城市。但这并不能说明管控严格导致经济增长，因为：

A给出了导致这些城市有较快经济增长的其它原因（教育等）。

这是把同时存在的两个现象看成因果关系的典型，削弱手法就是给出他因、有因无果、无因有果、因果倒置。本文选项A就是给出他因。

bollenyyy

太感谢拉。。。

guting109

谢谢3楼 把答案和解释加在JJ里了~