ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 河西学校
打印 上一主题 下一主题

----无畏的希望---- 复习日记 总结

[复制链接]
31#
发表于 2009-3-2 13:32:00 | 只看该作者
楼主你好,我刚刚加入CD准备4月杀G,看到你的学习状况,实在是佩服啊,请多多指教。大家共勉。
我英语基础挺不好的,大学毕业了,4月21日考试,全职复习,这周的目标是先把OG过一遍。虽然看到大家说要重视GWD和PREP但是,我想我应该先把基础打牢。之前零散的看过一点OG,但是还在找工作和考研之间犹豫,所以希望重头来过,先系统的看一看。谢谢。
32#
发表于 2009-3-2 23:38:00 | 只看该作者
那个方法很不错哦,谢谢分享,大家一起来搜搜搜!
33#
发表于 2009-3-3 02:07:00 | 只看该作者
楼主的毅力很强大!偶要学习您~
34#
发表于 2009-3-3 04:00:00 | 只看该作者

每天必读

35#
发表于 2009-3-4 01:40:00 | 只看该作者
一直关注LZ!加油!
36#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-4 01:57:00 | 只看该作者

首先,感谢每天来看望我的同学们,祝大家在最后的冲刺关头,好好休息,调整好睡眠!我写完这个心得,也要睡觉了!呵呵。

3月3日晚心得
  

每套GWD里,总有2个是自己必定会错的语法题,但查完CD和国外论坛的讨论帖,收获都很大。

就是进度慢,每次都花很多时间弄懂错题!明天加快速度,进度滞后!

语法小陷阱:

地点状语 或 时间状语 换位计

地点状语或 时间状语,选项中会故意 将 地点状语 或 时间状语 的位置 与原题改变(挪前或挪后),说明这是一个考点陷阱!OG,PREPGWD里已经出现多次,切记!

比如美国为了民众健康建设了卫生设施的题(时间状语),

颁布法案对付网络恶性注册公司域名的题(时间状语)

地点状语 换位陷阱,举例如下:

地点状语 换位陷阱,举例如下:

GWD-9-Q39:          看似简单的         比较          平行题,地点状语位置     改变导致逻辑含义错误

Over 75 percent of the energy produced in France derives from nuclear power, while in Germany it is just over 33 percent.

 

 

A.    while in Germany it is just over 33 percent

B.    compared to Germany, which uses just over 33 percent

C.    whereas nuclear power accounts for just over 33 percent of the energy produced in Germany

D.    whereas just over 33 percent of the energy comes from nuclear power in Germany

E.     compared with the energy from nuclear power in Germany, where it is just over 33 percent

黄色是我认为语法有错的考点。

附老外帖子解释:

OA: C

A "It" has no clear referent.


B Incorrectly compares "75 percent (of the energy produced in France)" with "Germany." Also, "just over 33 percent," considering phrasing and placement, is confusing and unclear.


D Structure is awkward and confusing. Specifically, Choice D erroneously implies that "just over 33 percent of the energy" in France comes from "nuclear power in Germany."


E "It" has no clear referent, plus, the structure is awkward.

我的理解:

D为什么错?

比较的时候,比较的两个对象之间,必须完全对等。

是不是D里的in Germany位置改变了,导致逻辑含义不一样?

成了法国能源里有33%来自德国的核能?因为用的是the energy

应该放到前面去,

whereas just over 33 percent of the energy in Germany comes from nuclear power

 

 

摘录讨论帖:

首先
the
冠詞加在名詞前
一來可能是代表已經提過的東西
二來就需要限定

若採用D
Over 75 percent of the energy produced in France derives from nuclear power, whereas just over 33 percent of the energy comes from nuclear power in Germany.
第一個劃線部分相當完美
the energy
限定, 後面帶入produced(which is)prodced的簡化
強調the energy是指法國生產的

但是第二個劃線部份就相當不清楚
所謂comes from並非關代解釋
只是單純說33%energy是來自德國的核電
the energy
沒有解釋就加了冠詞
代表先前提過的
變成指向法國的energy
句意出錯

 薰衣紫草,认为33 percent of the energy有歧义可以理解为法国的energy (今天我也是这个理解,呵呵)

The intolerable flaw in D is that it disorts the meaning of the original sentence. The first half of the orginal sentence says that among the energy produced in France, 75% of it comes from nuclear power. The sentence then makes a comparison that in Germany, over 33% of the energy produced comes from nuclear power. But when you look at D, it's trying to say that IN FRANCE, over 33% of the energy comes from neclear power in German, another contry. When we check if the format is parallel, more important thing is to make sure if it's logically consistent.

 

 

另外的心得:

另外的心得:

注意:whereas引导的比较,主句、从句的主语从形式上可以不用完全一样。

主句主语是75 percent of the energy,从句的主语是nuclear power,这样也可以!PREP破解里很类似的例子!


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-4 2:07:30编辑过]
37#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-4 02:05:00 | 只看该作者

时间状语位置更替改变句子意思 同类题目补充:

GWD7-Q2:  逻辑主语
                     /
平行的陷阱总结的很好
                    /
代词指代/ 时间状语位置更替改变句子意思

The first commercially successful drama to depict Black family life sympathetically and the first play by a Black woman to be produced on Broadway[CH1] , it was Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun that won the New York Drama Critics’ Circle Award in 1959, and was later made into both a film and a musical.

 

  1. it was Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun that won the New York Drama Critics’ Circle Award in 1959, and was later made

  2. in 1959 A Raisin in the Sun, by Lorraine Hansberry, won the New York Drama Critics’ Circle Award and was later made

  3. Lorraine Hansberry won the New York Drama Critics’ Circle Award for A Raisin in the Sun in 1959, and it was later made

  4. Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun won the New York Drama Critics’ Circle Award in 1959 and was later made

  5. A Raisin in the Sun, by Lorraine Hansberry, won the New York Drama Critics’ Circle Award in 1959, and later made it

 

Ait多余

Bin 1959插入位置不好,隔开了同位语 in 1959这个时间状语放在整个句子前或者句子后,变成了整个句子的时间状语,不好。这里只修饰won这个动作。

C,同位语不匹配(drama和人)

D is the best

Emade it主语不正确,不合逻辑。

E后面用了and,导致made在结构上与前面的won平行,那主语就都是A Raisin in the Sun了,逻辑含义错误,A Raisin in the Sun不可能发出made这个动作。

(注意下面老外总结的“and的平行结构”,注意and前出现逗号的用法!)

 

注意本题BD的差别,同位语也存在匹配问题。

 

我在B,D之间徘徊,B为什么错?D里的所有格形式 sb’s sth 记得GMAC不倾向于这种结构啊?

The first commercially successful drama to depict Black family life sympathetically and the first play by a Black woman to be produced on Broadway, it was Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun that won the New York Drama Critics’ Circle Award in 1959, and was later made into both a film and a musical.

 

 

Lorraine Hansberry’s
        
A Raisin in the Sun
could be a contentious point in choice D.

Can somone confirm if 's is correct in this context?

Difficult to reject use of possesive here.It does not create any modifier problem & is as good as "by Lorraine" in E

B. in 1959 A Raisin in the Sun, by Lorraine Hansberry, won the New York Drama Critics’ Circle Award and was later made
        
(phrase seems to modify 1959)

in (B), the phrase in 1959 is causing a serious chaos. Never place such extra modifier before the subject of main clause. (B) is out.

我理解了,in 1959放在了整个句子的开头,导致后面的later这件事是发生在later in 1959,成了1959年这一年晚些时候发生的事情,与won the award成了同一年的发生的事情了。而题目的原意是获奖是在1959,这个戏剧被制作成电影和音乐是1959年之后的事情,不是同一年发生的。

 

 

DE的区别:

A major difference between the two choices is the PRESENCE of COMMA BEFORE "AND" IN E.This is precisely what it makes the choice E grammatically incorrect.Note that "A Raisin in the Sun" is the subject of the 1st clause as well as that of second one.In other words,the whole sentence is a simple sentence having two verbs.A COMMA BEFORE "AND" CAN ONLY BE USED TO JOIN TWO INDEPENDENT CLAUSES IN A COMPOUND SENTENCE.In E the absence of another subject after "and" invalidates the presence of comma before "and".This is precisely what the sentence is testing.View this for further illustration-

=>John went to the market and bought Official Guide. CORRECT
=>John went to the market, and bought Official Guide. INCORRECT
=>John went to the market, and he bought Official Guide. CORRECT
(注意老外总结的对,如果and前面出现了逗号,那么”,and”后出现的必然是一个独立的句子,要有自己的主语!)
E is the second case which is WRONG.

GWD-8-Q16: GWD-13-15  难题!时间状语位置变化  时态
                        
记得查老外帖子

Concerns about public health led to the construction between 1876 and 1904 of three separate sewer systems to serve metropolitan Boston.

A.    Concerns about public health led to the construction
                
between 1876 and 1904 of three separate sewer systems to serve

B.    Concerns about public health have led to the construction of three separate sewer systems
                
between 1876 and 1904 to serve

C.    Concerns about public health have led between 1876 and 1904 to the construction of three separate sewer systems for serving

D.    There were concerns about public health leading to the construction between 1876 and 1904 of three separate sewer systems serving

E.     There were concerns leading between 1876 and 1904 to the construction of three separate sewer systems for serving

 

时间状语位置变化 导致句子逻辑含义变化的题!

 

问题B 为什么错?

A is clear.

'Between 1876 and 1904' suggests that you need either 'past perfect' or 'simple past'. Original senetence is correct.

 

Concerns about public
                
health
                
led to the construction between 1876 and 1904 of three separate sewer systems to serve metropolitan Boston.

There are three guiding principles to solve this Q-
1)Read the original sentence & test each choice, the meaning should not change.B definitely changes the meaning-placing
between 1876 to 1904 after to denotes -concern led to the constructionbetween 1876 to 1904.There is a very minute difference.The original sentence wants to say-3 sewer systems were constructed between 1876 to 1904.The construction of 3 systems was because of concerns. However, B says-construction between 1876 to 1904 was due to...
If there was a comma before
leading in D,I would have given a second thought -use of participle phrase.Howeverr, that is not the case.health leading portion is wrong here.If it were,health that lead... it could have been correct.Moreover, it seems concerns were about (public
            
health leading....)i.e construction & everything is getting included in concern.
In E concerns seems to lead/leading which is definetely not what the sentence intends to convey.
2) Test for the tense;note that the sentence is talking about something a century back- definitely past tense.Eliminate B & C for 'have'.
3) U will rarely find a
construction like There were/was correct in GMATLAND.

 

 

38#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-4 03:44:00 | 只看该作者

下午又忍不住在网上订了贾樟柯刚出版的电影手记。一直都喜欢他影像里灰色的乡愁。每次看到从前的老照片,觉得时光就是不经意的闪过,没有机会重温就与温暖的叮咛永别。

在稻草燃烧的烟霭中,闻到童年放学回家路上的期待;

在搪瓷杯的伤疤里,夏天的白开水流淌着慈祥的目光;

在罐头玻璃里,会泛起荷塘里蜻蜓的倩影和小蝌蚪消失的小尾巴;

在废弃的注射针管药盒里,装满了蚕宝宝蜕变的渴望;

在漫天星空的夜晚,知了还在难以释怀地抒情。

而每个人,也在仰望月光里故乡的倒影。

39#
发表于 2009-3-4 05:34:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢分享你的学习.你的毅力一定成功
40#
发表于 2009-3-4 10:15:00 | 只看该作者
总结的很好呢!你一定花了很多时间找到这些详细的解释。谢谢分享!加油加油!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-5 01:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部