求助一道逻辑题，先谢谢了

hlz8601

19.  In an effort to go beyond resumes as tools in its search for executives, one leading company has resorted to interviewing the top candidates for a position all together in a single group. This technique is supposed to afford a direct comparison of the candidates with respect to some personal qualities that cannot be gleaned from a resume.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the value of the simultaneous interview technique?

(A) Resumes do sometimes allow reliable inferences to be made about a candidate’s personal qualities.（只说明简历能反映出候选人的个性特点，无关）

(B) The simultaneous interview could become cumbersome if there were a great many candidates for a position.（削弱，说明面试不灵活的缺点）

(C) The more perceptive the interviewer, the more revealing the simultaneous interview is apt to be.（无关）

(D) There are certain personal qualities that only an extended simultaneous interview can bring out.（加强）（E）

(E) The simultaneous interview distorts each candidate’s response style by inducing stresses unlike any an executive position induces.（说明面试的缺点，直接削弱）

我认为答案是B，理由附后，而大全上面给的正确答案是E。

另外，怎么没人讨论大全上面的题目啊，我正在做大全，大家觉得用什么做复习资料比较好？

樱桃豆

我的理解是哦:题目中说interview top candidates, 而选项B中说的是many candidates.我觉得原文的意思就已经是他不可能人人都面了,TOP的人毕竟是少数,所以不会出现B说的这种缺点~
个人理解,仅供参考~

286的幸福观

B确实说了simultaneous interview的不好，但是没有weaken结论，因为结论并不是笼统说simultaneous interview比一般的要好，而是focus于with respect to some personal qualities that cannot be gleaned from a resume.E直接说了simultaneous interview会歪曲应聘者的反映，所以结论所说的some personal qualities是不能从中准确得出的。