ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1848|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]大全C-19

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-12-11 20:48:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]大全C-19

C-19.       Manufacturers of household appliances are still urging the public to purchase food processors. The various manufacturers’ advertisements all point out that the prices of these appliances are now lower than ever and that each food processor comes with a lifetime service warranty. In addition, many manufacturers offer sizable rebates to customers who purchase food processors within a given time period. With these incentives, the advertisements contend, people can hardly afford not to purchase food processors.

Which answer choice is a logically prior issue that the manufacturers’ advertisements fail to address?

(A) Whether the cost of repairs to the food processors over the years will cancel out the savings currently being offered

(B) Whether potential customers have enough uses for food processors to justify purchasing them

(C) Whether the heads of the companies manufacturing food processors own food processors themselves

(D) Whether the food processors currently being advertised will be outdated within the next five yearsB

(E) Whether accessories and replacement parts will be readily available at retail outlets

答案B。为什么?这题我无论如何都觉得应该选E。请教了!

沙发
发表于 2008-12-13 08:21:00 | 只看该作者

个人的理解。。仅供参考

首先说答案B。。FOOD PROCESSORS到底对客户有多少用处。客户才会去买他们。。也就是说即使企业吹嘘的在好在多回扣。在多保证。但如果他没调查过是不是有这个需要。在好也卖不出去

E答案我个人觉的不影响销量。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-12-13 10:50:00 | 只看该作者

恩。谢谢。B确实有道理。但是我还是觉得E也没错

如果买不到配件什么的,坏了啊什么的就没法修没法用,买的人自然会考虑这个。哎

地板
发表于 2008-12-13 15:53:00 | 只看该作者

我也经常碰到逻辑觉的答案好象不唯一。听牛人说作的多了即使那个象也不会选。。。还是要多作啊看来。。

5#
发表于 2010-8-15 21:58:07 | 只看该作者
with a lifetime service warranty

有保證應該不用關心E了吧

請指教
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 02:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部