以下是引用jelt2359在2009/8/24 23:34:00的发言: John List and Steven Levitt are also two world-leading economists (I took classes with both of them) at the UofC who are great champions of the Behavioural Economics cause. If anything, I believe Chicago is leading the charge on understanding behavioural economics.
As for Gary Becker, while he does deal with non-conventional topics of Economics and (less so) Finance, he actually does so under the influence of a lot of other disciplines- in particular, Sociology. While he had indeed extended economic analysis into non-conventional realms, that is not the same as the Behavioural Economics that List and Levitt (which depends on running experiments, understanding human psychology, and so on) are really making headway in.
Behavioral Economics, Nobel Laureate should be Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky. and Becker was one of the first economists to branch into what were traditionally considered topics belonging to sociology, including racial discrimination, crime, family organization, and drug addiction (Cf. Freakonomics and Rational addiction). He is known for arguing that many different types of human behavior can be seen as rational and utility maximizing. His approach can include altruistic behavior by defining individuals' utility appropriately. He is also among the foremost exponents of the study of human capital. - investments in human capital
- behavior of the family (or household), including distribution of work and allocation of time in the family
- crime and punishment
- discrimination on the markets for labor and goods.
Becker’s Nobel lecture, "Nobel Lecture: The Economic Way of Looking at Behavior", subsequently published in the Journal of Political Economy, reviews his four key areas of research. He explains that his framework of analysis is not a traditional self-interested motivation but rather an analysis based on a set of assumptions and individual preferences. |