再问gwd2 Q8

drakedog2

GWD3-Q8:

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Garnet and RenCo each provide health care for their employees.  Garnet pays for both testing of its employees’ cholesterol levels and treatment of high cholesterol.  This policy saves Garnet money, since high cholesterol left untreated for many years leads to conditions that require very expensive treatment.  However, RenCo dose not have the same financial incentive to adopt such a policy, because ______.

A.      early treatment of high cholesterol dose not entirely eliminate the possibility of a stroke later in life 不能消除也能抑制，无关选项

B.       the mass media regularly feature stories encouraging people to maintain diets that are low in cholesterol  可以理解为Renco鼓励人们吃低胆固醇的食品所以间接抑制了发病率所以不需要那个政策

C.      RenCo has significantly more employees than Garnet has 人多所以可能平时检查的钱太多了就不如直接治病来的划算

D.      RenCo’s employees are unlikely to have higher cholesterol levels than Garnet’s employees 直接说了renco没有那么多高胆固醇的人当然不用那个政策

E.       the average length of time an employee stays with RenCo is less than it is with Garnet 是答案也有道理

要是用排除法一个是E也可以被排除，是不是我想太多了，但是就是觉得bcde都有理由，请指点

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

savageprince

同问, 这麽些年了也没人看看..

savageprince

D为虾米不对啊.?

savageprince

UP, 在线等..

逆水潜龙

逻辑关键是一步到位，即使有些答案可能间接推导出结论，如你说得C:人多所以可能平时检查的钱太多了就不如直接治病来的划算。你加入了你的主观思维。你怎么知道人多检查的钱就一定比人少但要治疗的人花费多呢？或者一个疗程for one person比你检查全公司人花费更多都未定。。。再看E。R公司人留下工作时间得比G公司快·直接一步讲明R没必要实施G的政策。