看到了最近的语法机经:If China’s 1.6 billion people were to consume fish at the rate of the Japan,they would…… B) If China’s 1.6 billion people were to consume fish at the same rate as the Japan, C) If China’s 1.6 billion people would consume fish at the same rate as the Japan’s, D) If the 1.6 billion people in China would consume fish at the same rate as the Japan, E) If the 1.6 billion people in China consume fish at the same rate as the Japan’s 然后就google了一下,找到了这样一篇文章,貌似和阅读机经里的Aquacultural还挺像的,大家可以看看 " target="_blank">www.earth-policy.org/Alerts/Alert9.htm+If+China%E2%80%99s+1.6+billion+people+were+to+consume+fish+at+the+rate+of+the+Japan%EF%BC%8Cthey+would&hl=zh-CN&ct=clnk&cd=6&gl=cn&st_usg=ALhdy28U2wYkC4D4LgDBi1ZY7rpq2X6oEw">www.earth-policy.org/Alerts/Alert9.htm+If+China%E2%80%99s+1.6+billion+people+were+to+consume+fish+at+the+rate+of+the+Japan%EF%BC%8Cthey+would&hl=zh-CN&ct=clnk&cd=6&gl=cn&st_usg=ALhdy28U2wYkC4D4LgDBi1ZY7rpq2X6oEw" target="_blank">http://203.208.33.101/search?q=cache:Z_uy2uVUK0IJ:www.earth-policy.org/Alerts/Alert9.htm+If+China%E2%80%99s+1.6+billion+people+were+to+consume+fish+at+the+rate+of+the+Japan%EF%BC%8Cthey+would&hl=zh-CN&ct=clnk&cd=6&gl=cn&st_usg=ALhdy28U2wYkC4D4LgDBi1ZY7rpq2X6oEw 然后,里面有一句话就是上面的那句,非常相似: If China’s 1.25 billion were to eat seafood at the same rate, they would need 100 million tons-the global fish catch. |