『照旧』的BJ二战--JJ和感想 10.12

a336000

我要扔鸭蛋~~720那么高

不过楼主要冲满分 我绝对支持！谢谢你提供的jj~~嘿嘿

百草园Tracy

LZ考得很高了，不过鼓励和800拉近距离！（不知LZ什么时候申请，今年申请的话建议多花些时间在申请材料上了，有点赶了）

那个SC是不是选A啊？

二、虚拟语气在if 引导的条件句中的用法：
（一）、表示与现在事实相反的情况。其句子结构为：
从句：if + 主语+ 动词的过去式(be 用were) + ……
主句：主语+ would (should, could , might) + 动词原形+ ……
例：
1.If I were you, I would go with him.
2.If the weather were fine, I would go there.
如果天气好，我去那儿。（事实天气不好）
3.If I were you, I would read it again.
如果我是你的话，我再读一遍。（事实上我不是你）

怎么觉得A的结构那么好。

请NN确认下。

pelong

谢谢大家。

不是我矫情，只是觉得这个分数有点对不起自己，呵呵。

我今年不申了，T还没考呢。

那道语法题，我的一点想法：

as the Japan肯定不对，因为这样是吧rate 跟 the Japan比较了。这样只剩B和E。

我当时隐约决得they指代China's 1.6 billion 好像不妥，所以才选的E。不过觉得E不用虚拟语气的却不太妥。

但是我的确很清楚的记得，今天考试的时候前面有一个SC题，题干部分是 If sb do sth，sb2 would do sth。If后面用的就是一般现在时。继续讨论吧。

百草园Tracy

google找到一段原文，老美真阴险！

With overfishing now commonplace, developing countries are turning to fish farming to satisfy their growing appetite for seafood largely because the oceanic option is not available to them as it was earlier to industrial countries. For example, as population pressure on the land intensified in Japan over time, it turned to the oceans for its animal protein, using scarce land for rice. Today Japan’s 125 million people consume some 10 million tons of seafood each year. If China’s 1.25 billion were to eat seafood at the same rate, they would need 100 million tons-the global fish catch.

mcfate_777

c

china’s 1.6 billion people没什么不好，相反更准确，they指代中心词people，最关键的是要用虚拟语气。。。。

mcfate_777

呃 

既然原文都找到了 那就定下是c了

mcfate_777

以下是引用百草园Tracy在2008-10-12 19:25:00的发言：

LZ考得很高了，不过鼓励和800拉近距离！（不知LZ什么时候申请，今年申请的话建议多花些时间在申请材料上了，有点赶了）

那个SC是不是选A啊？

二、虚拟语气在if 引导的条件句中的用法：
（一）、表示与现在事实相反的情况。其句子结构为：
从句：if + 主语+ 动词的过去式(be 用were) + ……
主句：主语+ would (should, could , might) + 动词原形+ ……
例：
1.If I were you, I would go with him.
2.If the weather were fine, I would go there.
如果天气好，我去那儿。（事实天气不好）
3.If I were you, I would read it again.
如果我是你的话，我再读一遍。（事实上我不是你）

怎么觉得A的结构那么好。

请NN确认下。

a 比较对象不一致

中国人不能和日本国家比  （ 这话说得怎么感觉那么别扭）恩  日本国家不能和中国人比！！

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-10-12 20:18:12编辑过]

百草园Tracy

LZ他选项里没有再把A打出来，原来的A是.....at the rate of Japan（划线部分）

你是不是看成B了？

minivicki

以下是引用百草园Tracy在2008-10-12 20:12:00的发言：

google找到一段原文，老美真阴险！

With overfishing now commonplace, developing countries are turning to fish farming to satisfy their growing appetite for seafood largely because the oceanic option is not available to them as it was earlier to industrial countries. For example, as population pressure on the land intensified in Japan over time, it turned to the oceans for its animal protein, using scarce land for rice. Today Japan’s 125 million people consume some 10 million tons of seafood each year. If China’s 1.25 billion were to eat seafood at the same rate, they would need 100 million tons-the global fish catch.

偶觉得应该是A吧。首先根据楼上的google原文，我们可以确定要用虚拟语气。其次，要么是at the same rate as Japan's (其实应该是at the same rate as that of Japan更好，可惜没有），要么是at the rate of Japan. 这样看来只能是A了。

请大家讨论！

If China’s 1.6 billion people were to consume fish at the rate of the Japan，they would怎么样。。。后面忘了，汗。

A)If China’s 1.6 billion people were to consume fish at the rate of the Japan

B) If China’s 1.6 billion people were to consume fish at the same rate as the Japan,

C) If China’s 1.6 billion people would consume fish at the same rate as the Japan’s,

D) If the 1.6 billion people in China would consume fish at the same rate as the Japan,

E) If the 1.6 billion people in China consume fish at the same rate as the Japan’s

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-10-12 20:36:07编辑过]

cmazhaoyu

应该是A吧，只有A用了at the rate of Japan，而不是the rate as Japan，没用as自然就不存在LZ说的people 和 Japan的比较了

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-10-12 21:25:11编辑过]