求助一下GWD-4-14~

summera

Guidebook writer:  I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward.  Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?

 

A.      The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.

B.       Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.

C.      The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.

D.      The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished. 后面这句是啥米意思？为什么这个现象在文中都没提过的会能够起到削弱作用

      E.   The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930

说实话最初我选的是B，虽然觉得关系不大但是是用排除法排除出来的，笨笨我实在是脑子糊掉搞不清为什么D能削弱了。。请各位大大们帮忙解决下~感激不尽s~

iamwuyan

前几天刚有人问过, 搜一下就出来了.

后面的那句说建筑毁坏

D的意思是说现在能看到的1930年以前的建筑是质量好的, 因为质量不好的早塌了, 从而削弱题干的对比结论, 用来比较的两样东西CONDITION并不相同, 怎么能用来生成有力的说法呢?

summera

谢谢lsmm的解答~不好意思那我应该现搜一下下的~忘记了^^b

katrinaxy520

终于明白了，我当时也想了半天．考场上我一紧张怎么想的出来呀．．．看来自己太苯了！！！

Powellyao

ding

audreyzhang2

thx for the help! I am confused about it for a long time.