ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3975|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教LSAT-1-1-5,6

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-5-4 15:56:00 | 只看该作者

请教LSAT-1-1-5,6

5. Emperor: The enemy empire across the sea has harassed us for centuries. I want to conquer it and stop it once and for all. What advice can you give me?

Admiral: If you cross the sea, a mighty empire will fall.

Emperor: In that case, prepare the troops. We set sail tonight.

Of the following, the strongest criticism of the Emperor’s decision to invade would be that it.

(A) Is certain to lead to the emperor’s defeat

(B) Is based on opinion rather than objective facts about troop strength

(C) Contradicts the Admiral’s statement

(D) Fails to consider fully the possible meanings of the Admiral’s advice

(E) Is a futile strategy for solving the problem at hand

答案:D,我觉得B也行啊,为什么不对呢?

请教做对话题有什么好办法吗?

6. No senator spoke at the convention unless he or she was a Democrat. No Democrat both spoke at the convention and was a senator

Which one of the following conclusions can be correctly drawn from the statements above?

(A) N one but senators spoke at the convention.

(B) No Democrat spoke at the convention.

(C) Only Democrats spoke at the convention.

(D) No senator spoke at the convention.

(E) Some Democrat senators spoke at the convention.

答案:D

我完全没有思路这种题该怎么做呢?

谢谢。
沙发
发表于 2003-5-5 00:31:00 | 只看该作者
1.不要脱离原文的逻辑. B is out of scope. 比如说原文讲根据一个survey做了一个结论, 首选答案应该是和survey有关, 例如survey不够representative. 这道题D和原文的逻辑有直接的关系, 首选.

2. 以前讨论过. 我找找.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-5-5 07:22:00 | 只看该作者
能否讲讲T2的思路?
完全晕了头了。
地板
发表于 2003-5-5 10:38:00 | 只看该作者
6,第一句说明会议上如果有参议员发言的话,他只能是民主党的参议员,第二句讲发言的人要么是民主党员,要么是参议员。根据第一句,否定掉参议员,只剩民主党了。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-5-6 15:54:00 | 只看该作者
总算明白了.谢谢cranberry.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-7 04:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部