ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 9922|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

如果想进二线咨询,中欧和长江的MBA哪个比较合适?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-3-27 14:24:00 | 只看该作者

如果想进二线咨询,中欧和长江的MBA哪个比较合适?

两个学校的08 offer都收到了,长江的奖学金比中欧的多一些

背景是国内名校小硕,4年国际Top2 通信公司研发经验

希望毕业后可以转作咨询,MBB不想了,ATK,RB,IBM之类的可以努力一下

中欧最近几年都有个位数的人去麦肯锡、bcg。还有一些二线咨询,现在正在咨询实习生的面试,知名度在国内比较高,在咨询公司校友相对较多。但缺点是人比较多,IT背景更多,竞争激烈,而且教授水平略微差一些

长江每年也有几个去ATK,RB,IBM的,缺点是比较新,知名度不如中欧,但教授水平高,人少,职业发展中心的服务也比较周到,有没有了解的大侠

马上就要交定金了

沙发
发表于 2008-3-27 22:49:00 | 只看该作者
中欧
板凳
发表于 2008-3-30 14:59:00 | 只看该作者
why
地板
发表于 2008-3-31 11:50:00 | 只看该作者

If you are just targeting consulting, I would say CK.  Because 1). both schools give you the opportunity to interview with consulting firms.  And once you interview with them, whether you come from CEIBS or CK or even HBS doens't matter. 

2). teaching quality is very important.  Coz if you really learns in B-school, you may be able to show it through interview, and you will be better adapted after you start your work.

But if you also consider industry, CEIBS may be a better choice becuase its brand and network.

5#
发表于 2008-3-31 13:13:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用三十以后在2008-3-31 11:50:00的发言:

If you are just targeting consulting, I would say CK.  Because 1). both schools give you the opportunity to interview with consulting firms.  And once you interview with them, whether you come from CEIBS or CK or even HBS doens't matter. 

2). teaching quality is very important.  Coz if you really learns in B-school, you may be able to show it through interview, and you will be better adapted after you start your work.

But if you also consider industry, CEIBS may be a better choice becuase its brand and network.

you mean CK has better teaching quality, and it will be more useful to be ready for consulting firsm interview???

6#
发表于 2008-4-1 07:00:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用Vista2008在2008-3-31 13:13:00的发言:

you mean CK has better teaching quality, and it will be more useful to be ready for consulting firsm interview???

Teach quality: that's what LZ said, and my vague impression.

Useful for interview: yes. Coz case interview is about marketing/operation/finance, and if you don't learn these well, it would be hard for you to perform well during interview.

7#
发表于 2009-2-2 13:26:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用三十以后在2008-4-1 7:00:00的发言:

Teach quality: that's what LZ said, and my vague impression.

Useful for interview: yes. Coz case interview is about marketing/operation/finance, and if you don't learn these well, it would be hard for you to perform well during interview.

Agree!

8#
发表于 2009-2-3 08:41:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用三十以后在2008-3-31 11:50:00的发言:

If you are just targeting consulting, I would say CK.  Because 1). both schools give you the opportunity to interview with consulting firms.  And once you interview with them, whether you come from CEIBS or CK or even HBS doens't matter. 

2). teaching quality is very important.  Coz if you really learns in B-school, you may be able to show it through interview, and you will be better adapted after you start your work.

But if you also consider industry, CEIBS may be a better choice becuase its brand and network.

这英文写得,呵呵!还是写中文自然一点!

个人觉得咨询面试更重要的还是自身的表达能力和逻辑思维能力!与商学院的教学关系不太大!

9#
发表于 2009-2-4 17:43:00 | 只看该作者
himichael后来决定去哪了
以下是引用hlmichael在2008-3-27 14:24:00的发言:

两个学校的08 offer都收到了,长江的奖学金比中欧的多一些

背景是国内名校小硕,4年国际Top2 通信公司研发经验

希望毕业后可以转作咨询,MBB不想了,ATK,RB,IBM之类的可以努力一下

中欧最近几年都有个位数的人去麦肯锡、bcg。还有一些二线咨询,现在正在咨询实习生的面试,知名度在国内比较高,在咨询公司校友相对较多。但缺点是人比较多,IT背景更多,竞争激烈,而且教授水平略微差一些

长江每年也有几个去ATK,RB,IBM的,缺点是比较新,知名度不如中欧,但教授水平高,人少,职业发展中心的服务也比较周到,有没有了解的大侠

马上就要交定金了

10#
发表于 2009-2-8 12:10:00 | 只看该作者
LZ去了中欧
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-28 15:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部