|
A new law gives ownership of patents—documents providing exclusive right to make and sell an invention—to universities, not the government, when those patents result from government-sponsored university research. Administrators at Logos University plan to sell any patents they acquire to corporations in order to fund programs to improve undergraduate teaching.
Which of the following, if true, would cast most doubt on the viability of the college administrators’ plan described above?
(A) Profit-making corporations interested in developing products based on patents held by universities are likely to try to serve as exclusive sponsors of ongoing university research projects.
(B) Corporate sponsors of research in university facilities are entitled to tax credits under new federal tax-code guidelines.
(C) Research scientists at Logos University have few or no teaching responsibilities and participate little if at all in the undergraduate programs in their field.
(D) Government-sponsored research conducted at Logos University for the most part duplicates research already completed by several profit-making corporations.
(E) Logos University is unlikely to attract corporate sponsorship of its scientific research.
OG的答案是D：说明因为企业已经研究出了成果，所以不会买专利。 我认为OG的解释没有逻辑，什么叫做patents！Logos 要卖自己拥有的专利，即使企业有了相同的研究，它也必须得买。否则便是违法的啊！ 当然，如果企业先行申请到专利，则Logos便不会拥有专利，此时也就不存在卖专利的问题。毕竟人家领导的决定是卖自己会得到的专利，并没有提到卖研究成果！如果企业会现行得到专利，则此些内容便不再人家领导的考虑范围了。也就是说人家卖的就是自己的专利，对别人的专利也不眼馋！ 也就是说，只要Logos卖的是“专利”（也就是说明已经先行申请到了）。则此种售卖在理论上并不受到企业是非已经完成Duplicates“研究”（也就是说明没有申请到专利）的影响。 所以，我认为此题基本没有正确答案！ 如果要cast the most doubt，也能有一种情况：Logos已经或者将要得到的专利根本没有市场。 欢迎各位NN批评指正 | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2008-3-15 11:54:00
楼主
