ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 祝英台
打印 上一主题 下一主题

北美二战娘子军

[复制链接]
961#
发表于 2008-4-15 04:00:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用祝英台在2008-4-15 3:52:00的发言:
我觉得不可能是单数因为你看没花线的部分and so were probably without language, a shortcoming that may explain why they were supplanted by our own species. 说明主语肯定是复数啊,其次集合名词如pepole, 谓语肯定也是复数啊。郁闷

我晕了。。。

再看了一眼OG,原来意思是这样。。。

N是复数,但是N作为群落的解剖学上的共同特征要用单数表示。。。。。表示他们都只有一个声带。。。。。汗!

962#
发表于 2008-4-15 04:03:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用祝英台在2008-4-15 3:54:00的发言:

答案是A。

你说的这些我都同意,但是这两个问题还不解中

1,在D 中:The finding that... is suggestive of one reason, if used ...., certain pesticides...为什么 if 的逻辑主语也是one reason, 我认为也可能是finding, or certain pesticides.

2,另外if used...到底是跟前边的句子还是跟后边的句子,certain pesticides...这个句子是不是跟前边的句子run-on啊,木有连词阿

2. if放在中间,非常不好,没有连词,就不知道是跟前面还是跟后面,你的感觉没有错,这句话写成这样一定不会对啦。

就是因为if的没有连词,所以歧意就这么产生了。。。

963#
发表于 2008-4-15 04:10:00 | 只看该作者
英台的这个例句充分说明ETS的不要脸和阴险。。。
964#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-4-15 04:33:00 | 只看该作者

216. Many policy experts say that shifting a portion of health-benefit costs back to the workers helps to control the employer's costs, but also helps to limit medical spending by making patients more careful consumers.
        

(C) not only helps to control the employer's costs, but also helps
        

答案C

这里by making patients more careful consumers是什么意思啊

965#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-4-15 04:41:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用祝英台在2008-4-15 3:37:00的发言:

200. Certain pesticides can become ineffective if used repeatedly in the same place: one reason is suggested by the finding that there are much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in soils that are free of such chemicals.
    

(A)
   Certain pesticides can become ineffective if used repeatedly in the same place; one reason is suggested by the finding that there are much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in soils that are free of such chemicals.

(B)
   If used repeatedly in the same place, one reason that certain pesticides can become ineffective is suggested by the finding that there are much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in soils that are free of such chemicals.

(C)
   If used repeatedly in the same place, one reason certain pesticides can become ineffective is suggested by the finding that much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes are found in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than those that are free of such chemicals.

(D)
   The finding that there are much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in soils that are free of such chemicals is suggestive of one reason, if used repeatedly in the same place, certain pesticides can become ineffective.

(E)
   The finding of much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in those that are free of such chemicals suggests one reason certain pesticides can become ineffective if used repeatedly in the same place.

1,在D 中:The finding that... is suggestive of one reason, if used ...., certain pesticides...为什么 if 的逻辑主语也是one reason, 我认为也可能是finding, or certain pesticides.

MM你看A中if used OG说他是修饰certain pesticide,不管他是不是if certain pesticide are used 的省略但是修饰主句,

可是D中if used 为什么不是修饰主句了,变成了修饰reason了,OG的解释让人看得云里雾里的,而且看了多少遍OG总发现有不懂得,看不到的,想不到的。其阴险系数相当之高啊

966#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-4-15 04:46:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用lenaqian在2008-4-15 4:00:00的发言:

我晕了。。。

再看了一眼OG,原来意思是这样。。。

N是复数,但是N作为群落的解剖学上的共同特征要用单数表示。。。。。表示他们都只有一个声带。。。。。汗!

瀑布汗...怎么没看出那里有解剖学

俺一直是这样理解的:N有个发声音的部位很像猿猴的发声音的部位,并且N没有语言......

不过Lena你讲的N是复数在这里做单数讲,俺实在理解不了了.......ETS杀了我吧,郁闷死了....

967#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-4-15 09:59:00 | 只看该作者

OG251,

The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's. .
A. extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than
B. extinction; its numbers are now five times more than
C. extinction, their numbers now fivefold what they were
D. extinction, now with fivefold the numbers they had
E. extinction, now with numbers five times greater than   答案是A

1,D,E关于with的修饰,OG说with 看起来是extinction。是不是可以这样理解:前面没逗号,修饰的是前面的名词。如果前面有逗号,修饰的是主语,如OG251

2,没太看明白OG的解释关于B,OG说用more 好像there are more numbers rather than more gyrfalcons.

A中用 its numbers are...great than...用greater,为什么啊?

968#
发表于 2008-4-15 11:30:00 | 只看该作者

我好疯了我,怎么越到考试越差劲,25道PREP SC错10个!!!

烦死了烦死了烦死了!

969#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-4-15 12:39:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用许仙在2008-4-15 11:30:00的发言:

我好疯了我,怎么越到考试越差劲,25道PREP SC错10个!!!

烦死了烦死了烦死了!

许仙,做题是要找到做题的方法,并不是单纯的追求准确率,分析错误的原因,这样才能不断进步。

你现在一定要做到心平气和,不要太想结果。

970#
发表于 2008-4-15 13:55:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用许仙在2008-4-15 11:30:00的发言:

我好疯了我,怎么越到考试越差劲,25道PREP SC错10个!!!

烦死了烦死了烦死了!

没事的,我做OG还错好多呢,反正已经到这个地步了,能抓多少就多少了。

很多题全靠逻辑理解。。。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-8 03:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部