北美二战娘子军

lenaqian

以下是引用祝英台在2008-4-16 1:15:00的发言：

E中 strong and interesting women,和every one of H's wife应该是同位语吧， 谓语were应该跟那个保持一致啊？

B的错误，还是不明白， each of them H's wives 看不出错误啊？

恭喜usababy要做妈妈了，一边考G，一边生娃，不是一般的强啊~

Ｂ中each是代词，them指代就是H‘s wivies，不需要them了。直接用each of H's wives(这个也不是好结构）

要么就用each of whom is a wife of H

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-4-16 1:34:01编辑过]

lenaqian

Ｅ中Strong and interesting women(主语）—Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhom, and Mary Welsh--（修饰部分，同位语）every one of Hemingway's wives were （谓语）

这里的every on of H 不能做同位语，如果是同位语，中间要逗开，像Ｄ中一样。

且，这里也不可以做，逻辑上不对。如果做了同位语，翻译出来就是，强壮有趣的女人，每一个都是海明威的老婆。。。。

许仙

以下是引用lenaqian在2008-4-16 1:27:00的发言：

Ｅ中Strong and interesting women(主语）—Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhom, and Mary Welsh--（修饰部分，同位语）every one of Hemingway's wives were （谓语）

这里的every on of H 不能做同位语，如果是同位语，中间要逗开，像Ｄ中一样。

且，这里也不可以做，逻辑上不对。如果做了同位语，翻译出来就是，强壮有趣的女人，每一个都是海明威的老婆。。。。

对对对，LENA说的这个非常经典。E选项里看似是同位语，但是少了个逗号，意思就变了，就不是同位语了。

LENA你的SC真是厉害！！

祝英台

41. Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied. Congress has been required to call a conven­tion for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legisla­tures of two-thirds of the states.
        

(A) was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it

(B) was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consider­ation of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(C) was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(D) has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

(E) has never been applied. Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amend­ments to the document when formally asked to do so

1，A,B的时态错，怎么能判断出来呢？

2，wherby是个adv,为什么OG的解释却说他introduce a sentence fragment呢？

祝英台

以下是引用许仙在2008-4-16 2:06:00的发言：

对对对，LENA说的这个非常经典。E选项里看似是同位语，但是少了个逗号，意思就变了，就不是同位语了。

LENA你的SC真是厉害！！

Lena的SC不是一般的厉害，是咱们的镇坛之宝啊~~~

zy39063

俺语法真不是一般的烂，看到大家讨论一题接一题的，完全插不上话，看讨论都慢，彻底

zy39063

不管同意不同意把你们这些SC宝都狠狠熊抱一下，俺得沾点宝气上战场

祝英台

62. Geologists believe that the warning signs for a major earthquake may include sudden fluctuations in local seismic activity, tilting and other deformations of the Earth’s crust, changing the measured strain across a fault zone, and varying the electrical properties of underground rocks.

(D) changes in the measured strain across a fault zone, and variations in（D）

(E) changes in measurements of the strain across a fault zone, and variations among

答案是D

请问，D中的the measured strain across a fault zone和E中的measurements of the strain across a fault zone有什么区别啊？

lenaqian

以下是引用祝英台在2008-4-16 2:48:00的发言：

41. Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied. Congress has been required to call a conven­tion for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legisla­tures of two-thirds of the states.
  

(A) was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it

(B) was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consider­ation of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(C) was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(D) has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

(E) has never been applied. Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amend­ments to the document when formally asked to do so

1，A,B的时态错，怎么能判断出来呢？

2，wherby是个adv,为什么OG的解释却说他introduce a sentence fragment呢？

never, ever, since, for一段时间，都用现完。

第二个问题一定要搞明白，其实这题跟前面几题一样，你没有看清句子结构。

（介词结构放句首）Under a provision of the Constitution （限定修饰constitution) that has never been applied. (后面全是主句）Congress （主语）is required （谓语）to call a convention to consider possible amend­ments to the document when formally asked to do so

如果在congress这里加个thereby　(表因果关系副词）那主句在哪里？这就是ＯＧ说的句子结构不完整。

祝英台

抢个1000楼自己留着，哈哈