ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2268|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-27-1-24

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-13 12:59:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-27-1-24

24. Trade official: Country X deserves economic
retribution for its protectionism. However, it is
crucial that we recognize that there are
overriding considerations in this case. We should
still sell to X the agricultural equipment it
ordered: there is high demand in our country for
agricultural imports from X.
The argument depends on assuming which one of the
following principles?
(A) Agricultural components international trade
are more important than nonagricultural
commodities.
(B) The ability to keep popular products
available domestically is less important than our
being able to enter international market.
(C) We should never jeopardize the interests of
our people to punish a protectionist country.
(D) In most cases, punishing a protectionist
country should have priority over the interests
of our people.
(E) We should balance the justice of an action
with the consequences for our interests of
undertaking that action.


答案是E,我选了C。觉得两个都可以。不知道哪个更好点。请NN指点。
沙发
发表于 2003-12-14 10:44:00 | 只看该作者
Choice C is a little bit too absolute by using the word "never"
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-14 12:35:00 | 只看该作者
关于这个absolute的火候问题,我老是掌握不好。有什么原则吗?
地板
发表于 2003-12-14 16:18:00 | 只看该作者
原则不太清楚,应该总的来说不能过于绝对化吧
c这里的“should never jeopardize”,就是太绝对化了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-7 23:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部