ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2480|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-22-2-3

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-9 18:13:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-22-2-3

LSAT-22-2-3
22/2/3. The current move to patent computer programs is a move in the wrong direction and should be stopped. The patent system was originally designed solely to protect small-time inventors from exploitation. not to give large corporations control over a methodology. Any computer program is merely the implementation of a methodology.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) Computer programs should be developed not only be large corporations but by small-time inventors as well.
(B) Implementing a methodology always requires less creative effort than does true invention
(C) The issue of whether or not to patent computer programs presents the patent system with problems that have never before arisen
(D) Large corporations should not hold patents for implementations of methodologies
(E) Small-time inventors who support the move to patent computer programs act contrary to their own best interests

答案D。 以前的解释看了,还是不明白。D好像是arguer宣样的观点呀。怎么变成假设了?
沙发
发表于 2003-12-10 00:22:00 | 只看该作者
文中有三个个现象
一是the current move is wrong(这是结论)
二是the patent system was originally designed  not to give large corporations control
三是any computer program is merely the implementation of a methodology

要得到上面的那个结论,当然这里面还需要一个假设,d就正好弥补了这个空缺,你再想想
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-10 10:22:00 | 只看该作者
嘻嘻,想明白了。这个gap太小了,我反而不敢跳了。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-30 19:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部