ChaseDream
搜索
12345
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: lizaz
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全729

[精华] [复制链接]
41#
发表于 2009-7-28 08:53:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得that引导的从句没有错啊。。。
42#
发表于 2009-7-29 17:33:00 | 只看该作者
up
43#
发表于 2010-4-27 19:04:49 | 只看该作者
个人认为补全后是:A newly developed jumbo rocket, which is expected to carry the United States into its next phase of space exploration, will be able to deliver a heavier load of instruments into orbit than the space shuttle can, and( will be able to deliver them )at a lower cost.
44#
发表于 2010-6-4 10:01:42 | 只看该作者
为什么than the space shuttle can 补出的是can ,can 和be able to不是不一样的吗
45#
发表于 2010-6-4 10:30:38 | 只看该作者
阅过  佩服
46#
发表于 2013-5-20 14:11:49 | 只看该作者
答案选D,我是这样理解的。不同意的请举手!
A newly developed jumbo rocket, which is expected to carry the United States into its next phase of space exploration, will be able to deliver a heavier load of instruments into orbit than the space shuttle can, and at a lower cost.
which 是rocket的非限制性定语从句。
比较的对象是rocket(will be able to)和space shuttle (can)。
并列的对象是 will be able to deliver... 和 (will be) at a lower cost,主语都是A newly developed jumbo rocket
47#
发表于 2015-2-16 17:19:46 | 只看该作者
I wanna share my thoughts here. It's easy to reach answers D and E.
At first blush, I found E lacks "can" after SS, so I think the sentence is ambiguous since it means either 'JR will be able to deliver a heavier load of instruments into orbit than the space shuttle [will be able to do]' or ''JR will be able to deliver a heavier load of instruments into orbit than [deliver] space shuttle'.However, it's common sense that space shuttle is a kind of vehicle to deliver instrument rather than instrument itself. Thus, the lack of "can" should not be a split as long as the sentense is not ambiguous.
OK, once I can not find determinate error among choices, I have to think about the meaning of these sentences. Because the original sentence seems not to say the JR cost less, but to say the delivery cost less. Therefore, answer D is fit.
Note: keep the meaning of answer as that of original sentence. This is rule of thumb which hasn't verified by GMAT, but works well  till now. Manhattan also advocates this rule
48#
发表于 2015-5-26 21:09:03 | 只看该作者
solome 发表于 2003-12-7 23:05
以下是引用bluestone1在2003-12-7 23:00:00的发言: 我来试一下  A newly developed jumbo rocke ...

可不可以是 than the space shuttle can deliver ....  than后面是不是应该句子是完整的?and后面只是状语比较。而且能不能将and看成是递进的?
49#
发表于 2019-7-21 15:01:27 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-4 04:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部