以下是引用fly028在2005-2-24 13:08:00的发言:the argument ask for which one of those answers if is possible will consititue disadvantage to the company that take the process or methord of comparing two results between making investment and not making investment on the condition that such factors as cost ,sales price and share of market remain constant . obviously , if such factors are not changed , and by the process or methord , the company accurately decrease the cost , therefore it could draw a conclusion that the process is effective to cut cost . however if the company 's competitor , as D say that , take measure to low the sales price result in taking the share of market from the company , then constituting disadvantage to the company , the company can not say that the process is a efficient one . on other hand , the other answers can not definitely constitute disadvantage to the company . because the cost of material is uncertain , there are two possibile effects that probably benefit or harm the company , therefore the A is not right . as B says , the reducing interest cost will benefit , rather than consistitute disadvantage the company , thus the B should be rejected . C mention a difficulty the company might faced , but the difficulty is irreleative to the factors of cost , sales price and share of market , hence should be abandoned . E concerns the period of year to evaluate the effectiveness of the process , like C , E do not demonstrate the period will bring disadvantage to the company . sorry , i have written too much ! hope it will not seriously waste your time . 赞!!! |