大全-1-17

小女公子

公司不是说了它会考虑share of market constant吗？怎么能说D没有考虑到呢？？ 不懂这道题啊 我晕

and , what 's the relationship of "invest" and “cost-cut”

意思是说process可以cost-cut，然后对比cost-cut以后process在价格等方面的变化。如果不变，就cut掉。如果变了，就不能cut，及invest吗？？谢谢

Pudding

My two cents:

題目的意思是, 公司是在不考慮 costs, selling prices, and share of market變化的情況下 (remaining constant), 來比較投資或不投資此流程的結果, 並以此做出決定.

D則是說, 競爭者透過降低價格搶去市佔率, 這點是在公司沒考慮/測試到的範圍內, 因為公司在評估的時候是假定價格不變的...

"invest" 這個未來可以 "cost-cut"的新流程...say, 買一套新的設備 (invest), 以便可以節省更多成本(cost-cut)

fly028

the argument ask for  which one of those answers if is possible will consititue disadvantage to the company that take the process or methord of comparing two results between making investment and not making investment on the condition that such factors as cost ,sales price and share of market remain constant .

obviously , if such factors are not changed , and by the process or methord , the company accurately decrease the cost , therefore it could draw a conclusion that the process is effective to cut cost . however if the company 's competitor , as D say that , take measure to low the sales price result in taking  the share of market from the company , then  constituting disadvantage to the company , the company can not say that the process is a efficient one .

on other hand , the other answers can not definitely constitute disadvantage to the company . because  the cost of material is uncertain , there are two possibile effects that probably benefit or harm the company , therefore the A is not right . as B says , the reducing interest cost will benefit , rather than consistitute disadvantage the company , thus the B should be rejected .  C mention a difficulty the company might faced  , but the difficulty is irreleative to the factors of cost , sales price and share of market , hence should be abandoned . E concerns the period of year to evaluate the effectiveness of the process ,  like C , E do not demonstrate the period will bring disadvantage to the company .

sorry , i have written too much ! hope it will not seriously waste your time .

forjoke

题目很别扭，compare against 要是在语法区，绝对被毙掉了。

同意yhcui：

比较的是用了这种新过程的结果和不用它的结果，比较的限制条件是保证costs, selling prices, and share of market 不变。

答案D：其限制条件无法满足。比方市场份额下降了，你也不能说新方法不好，因为在竞争者来说就是新方法导致了市场份额的提高。总之有了D，题干的method就没法比出个名堂来。

jerrold0023

看到前面那么多的讨论，还是有点不明白the validity of D.

第一，原文说：Companies considering new cost-cutting manufacturing processes often compare the projected results of making the investment against the alternative of not making the investment with costs, selling prices, and share of market remaining constant.

我理解的大意是：公司常常用做投资项目的结果来比较没有做投资项目的结果，没有做投资项目的结果remaining constant. （而做投资项目的结果是否remaining constant, 我们不知道）

第二，原文在问：Which of the following, assuming that each is a realistic possibility, constitutes the most serious disadvantage for companies of using the method above for evaluating the financial benefit of new manufacturing processes?

我认为D虽然提到selling price，但C中的net gain更加直接。

欢迎指正！！！

ring_cheng

原文问的是：“在XX条件不变之下，比较两个不同项目的financial benefit”这一措施的不利之处？

答案要（隐）含该措施：

C隐含表达了：新项目还是可以有financial benefit的，但并没有点到“比较。。”这个措施的不利之处。

D通过说明竞争对手的作法，解释了“比较。。”这一措施的前提“XXX不变”是会发生变化的，因此削弱结论。

dreamerps

以下是引用fly028在2005-2-24 13:08:00的发言：

the argument ask for  which one of those answers if is possible will consititue disadvantage to the company that take the process or methord of comparing two results between making investment and not making investment on the condition that such factors as cost ,sales price and share of market remain constant .

obviously , if such factors are not changed , and by the process or methord , the company accurately decrease the cost , therefore it could draw a conclusion that the process is effective to cut cost . however if the company 's competitor , as D say that , take measure to low the sales price result in taking  the share of market from the company , then  constituting disadvantage to the company , the company can not say that the process is a efficient one .

on other hand , the other answers can not definitely constitute disadvantage to the company . because  the cost of material is uncertain , there are two possibile effects that probably benefit or harm the company , therefore the A is not right . as B says , the reducing interest cost will benefit , rather than consistitute disadvantage the company , thus the B should be rejected .  C mention a difficulty the company might faced  , but the difficulty is irreleative to the factors of cost , sales price and share of market , hence should be abandoned . E concerns the period of year to evaluate the effectiveness of the process ,  like C , E do not demonstrate the period will bring disadvantage to the company .

sorry , i have written too much ! hope it will not seriously waste your time .

感觉这个分析的比较贴切~只是看得好累啊~~

丑得老婆哭

Companies considering new cost-cutting manufacturing processes often compare the projected results of making the investment against the alternative of not making the investment with costs, selling prices, and share of market remaining constant.
把这个题目读懂最重要。

因此我将这句话分成几个部分。主要结构是compare......against。

句意：将投资后的预测结果和不投资的结果做比较。注意后面with，该词是表示比较的方式和条件：cost,parice,share保持不变。

因此，如果不能满足C,P,S的不变，则不能用这个方法比较。

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-9-16 20:45:31编辑过]

amber0919

judiwind2006

up