[分享][下载]10月18日换题库后RCJJ全整理（含索引和原始文件）

lovicd

哪位知道这个文章标题前面怎么把压缩标记加上去啊，不然总是不容易找到啊

guoguo463

以下是引用qincong83在2007-10-22 1:14:00的发言：

今天的JJ是伴随着眼泪整理出来的。

在狂开了十几个窗口搜寻JJ的时候，那个在我二战考前给我重创的人突然出现，让我措手不及。

逼着自己忘记和麻木重新投入二战，崩溃重新站起来一个月后却又在二战前夕让他伤害得更加惨烈，心口就像被刀子刮过一样。。本想从他口中听到哪怕是一点点的愧疚，结果却换来“两码事”的回答。是的，考试和分手，的确是“两码事”，对于他来说是“互斥”的“两码事”，但对于我来说是致命的摧毁。又是看似体贴冠冕堂皇地为自己辩解，说所谓的“作为朋友的关心”，我已经无力争辩，对待这样一个承认感情自私却仍然开心地朝别人伤口撒盐的人，我真的没有力气了……

关掉MSN，为什么，眼泪还是会滑落……

mm, 不值得为这样人流眼泪.

别伤心.PATPAT.

amorela

以下是引用qincong83在2007-10-25 8:45:00的发言：

谢谢文明姐给我的鼓励，谢谢楼上大家的鼓励～一觉醒来就看到这么多回复，很意外啊！

呵呵原本以为自己一个月已经走出来了，昨儿还是那么脆弱～没事的，我不会再因为这些事情影响了考试，这样就太对不起自己了，即使到时候去了他在的学校，我也会比他过得更好。

现在的RC JJ已经非常详细了，开始有一些回忆的题目出来了。一些题目我用加亮标明并总结出来，大家一定要多看出题点～

好了，模考去了：）

同学,拜托你,把那样的人删除+阻止吧.留你MSN里要永存纪念啊????早点删除+阻止就没这些事情了.安心复习吧.

好的在后面呢,这道理你怎么就不明白呢?乖,好好学习,天天向上.

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-10-25 14:40:53编辑过]

jennyliu521

好人啦，都是好人拉！

tommy0106

thank you lah~~~~

cissysweet

嗯，非常感谢qingcong

不知道说什么..

因为我们总会在错的时间遇到错的人

心情不好的时候就逼自己更加努力的做题吧！

加油啦!

claraqzq

呵呵,一定考出好成绩让那个人见鬼去吧!

qqort

感谢楼主！

楼主一定会幸福的！！：）

Whitney

感谢楼主MM,
From Duckfish
关于urban sprawl那道题目，本贴里有篇google上查到的文章，就是我考到的那篇的扩展版！大家看熟哦！
A View Of Urban Sprawl From Outer Space
Recent urban development in Los Angeles is less scattered than recent development in Boston. Miami is America's most compact big city and Pittsburgh is most sprawling. Changing the number or size of municipal governments in a metro area has no impact on whether or not urban development is scattered, but controlling access to groundwater does.
    These are among the startling findings from a University of Toronto-based team of researchers who used satellite data and aerial photography to create a grid of 8.7 billion data cells tracking the evolution of land use in the continental United States.
    Matthew Turner and Diego Puga of the University of Toronto, Marcy Burchfield of the Neptis Foundation, a Toronto-based organization focused on urban and regional research, and Henry Overman of the London School of Economics present their findings in the May issue of The Quarterly Journal of Economics, in a paper entitled Causes of Sprawl: A Portrait from Space. Heavily illustrated with Geographic Information System images, the paper challenges conventional wisdom about urban sprawl and presents a vivid and detailed picture of land consumption in America's cities.
    Though urban sprawl is widely regarded as an important environmental and social problem, according to the authors, much of the debate over sprawl is based on speculation. The data to conduct detailed and systematic measurement of how and where land is converted to urban use has, until now, simply not been available. Despite widespread interest in the topic, "we know next to nothing about the extent to which development is scattered or compact, and how this varies across space," they write.
    The authors merged high-altitude photos from 1976 with satellite images from 1992 (the most recent available) to create a grid of 8.7 billion 30-metre by 30-metre cells that tracks land use changes nationwide. "The data set we've constructed is unprecedented in that we have coverage of the whole continental United States with a very high degree of accuracy for two time periods. That's never been done before," says Turner.
    The new high-resolution data allow the authors to observe the amount of open space in the neighbourhood of every house in every U.S. city. Since development is more scattered when there is more open space around a house, the authors measured urban sprawl by calculating the average amount of open space in the neighborhood of a house in each city.
    They found that more recent residential development is not any more scattered than development was in 1976. Forty two per cent of land in the square kilometre surrounding the average residential development in 1976 was open space, compared with 43 per cent in 1992. "While a substantial amount of scattered residential development was built between 1976 and 1992, overall residential development did not become any more biased toward such sprawling areas."
    The authors are quick to point out that any one household would have seen much change in the study period, but that "if we zoom out and look at the city from a distance, we see little change, at least in terms of the proportions of sprawling and compact development: the new city is just like an enlarged version of the old city."
    Overall, Boston is less scattered than Atlanta, however recent development in Boston has been less compact than recent development in Atlanta. Miami, San Francisco and Los Angeles were the most compact major cities, while Pittsburgh and Atlanta were the most scattered.
    The authors also investigated why some cities are more sprawling than others. They found that a city's climate, topography and access to groundwater account for 25 per cent of the nationwide variation. When the climate is temperate, people spread out to have more space to enjoy the weather.
    Hilly places see more scattered development as people avoid the costs of building on hillsides — but mountains act as a barrier and lead to more compact development. Places with easy access to groundwater see more scattered development, since people can supply remote houses with water by drilling inexpensive wells rather than paying for water lines.
    "The presence of aquifers is particularly important," says Turner, "and that seems to me to have policy implications. It looks as if controlling access to groundwater is an important way to control whether development spreads or not."
    Roads, on the other hand, have no impact on the extent to which development is scattered, despite commonly held beliefs to the contrary. "We looked at a lot of measures of road density — miles of road per area, average distance to a road, distance to an interstate exit — and we could find no relation between those measures and the scatteredness of development," Turner says.
    The number of municipalities in a metropolitan area also does not affect development patterns. "You hear about fragmentation of jurisdictions being an important determinant of development patterns and we could find no evidence for that," says Turner. However, the team also found that development near cities is less scattered if it occurs in a municipality than if it occurs in an unincorporated area of a county. This suggests that people may be moving out to just beyond municipal boundaries in order to avoid more stringent municipal regulations.
    One of the common complaints about urban sprawl is that as development spreads, municipal services such as roads, sewers, police and fire protection are more expensive. The authors suggest that this concern is well founded. Development in municipalities that receive larger subsidies from higher levels of government is, on average, more scattered. Says Puga, "This suggests that as local taxpayers are held accountable for infrastructure costs, they respond by insisting on patterns of development that require less infrastructure spending."
    "People have been eager to rush to policy prescriptions without a very good understanding of the underlying phenomena," says Turner. "We wanted to try to put the policy discussion on sounder footing."

qincong83

Thank you guys, Whitney and  Duckfish!