ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: jiejie219
打印 上一主题 下一主题

半岛姐妹复习日记

[复制链接]
511#
发表于 2007-10-26 21:47:00 | 只看该作者

C.
For many Krenlandian manufacturers who face severe international
competition in both domestic and export markets, steel constitutes a
significant part of their raw material costs. 

    

我觉得这里的意思不是说国内钢厂losing domestic sales 的原因是本身钢材的原材料成本

C的意思是说k的很多制造商在竞争非常激烈的国内和出口市场, 而钢是他们原材料里重要的一组成部分。所以如果政府took measures to reduce cheap steel imports, 制造商的成本增加导致他们竞争力的削弱。。。Therefore, “it would protect not only steel
companies but also industrial employment in Krenland if our government
took measures to reduce cheap steel imports.”就不对啦~

我的理解是这样的

512#
发表于 2007-10-26 22:51:00 | 只看该作者

讨论一道数学题

4. (t/1000)4次方,小数点后有8个以下的0t可以是359中的哪几个?

几经上 说没思路,大家看我想得对不对

(t/1000)4次方=t^4*10^-12

要求小数点后有8各以下的0

那么就是要求        

(t/1000)4次方=t^4*10^-12

 =0.t^4*10^-8

也就是说 t^4 至少是个4 位数,那么 t 是 9

还有一道

11 有个整数数列
                    
第四项是7 第五项是5 这个数列的特点:后一项都是前面两项的和.如果前面两项的和是奇数;后面一项是前面两项和的1/2 如果前面两项的和是偶数
                    
求第一项

答案有-13 -11 争论挺多的

我做出了n个答案,不知道对不对

-1  4  3  7  5

2  4  3  7  5

-8  11  3  7  5

-5  11  3  7  5

-20  16  -2  7  5

-13  9  -2  7  5

513#
发表于 2007-10-26 23:23:00 | 只看该作者

支持t=9

数列题好象跟JJ的另一题有差条件“是正整数数列”,答案是2,,,如果没有规定是正整数,那就确实有很多个解了

514#
发表于 2007-10-26 23:32:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用pigscanfly在2007-10-26 21:47:00的发言:

C.
For many Krenlandian manufacturers who face severe international
competition in both domestic and export markets, steel constitutes a
significant part of their raw material costs. 

 

我觉得这里的意思不是说国内钢厂losing domestic sales 的原因是本身钢材的原材料成本

C的意思是说k的很多制造商在竞争非常激烈的国内和出口市场, 而钢是他们原材料里重要的一组成部分。所以如果政府took measures to reduce cheap steel imports, 制造商的成本增加导致他们竞争力的削弱。。。Therefore, “it would protect not only steel
companies but also industrial employment in Krenland if our government
took measures to reduce cheap steel imports.”就不对啦~

我的理解是这样的

是我没说清楚吧,我写的中文不是C项的翻译,而是C“说明” 也就是“指出”它因——国内钢厂做出来的钢价格居高不下,导致以这些钢为原材料的制造厂商没有竞争力,所以就算不进口,制造商还是因为承受不了那些高价钢材而不去购买,也就改变不了国内钢厂的命运,,,于是就削弱了原文的因“进口打击”,也否定了结论“减少进口就可以......”。


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-10-26 23:33:36编辑过]
515#
发表于 2007-10-27 03:23:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢小白和小Pig...藕明了。

其实steelcost构成了industry的一个重要的cost,如果steel cost增长,那么indurstry cost就会增长,那么employment就会上涨,这样就达不到目的即:减少进口来保护 steel company和减少employment

516#
发表于 2007-10-27 03:30:00 | 只看该作者

第一道数学题 T=9,

第二道题藕觉得有点问题,要不然真的是很多解。如果是如果后一项是奇数,那么他是前边两项的和,如果后一项是偶数,那么是前边两项的和的1/2,这样出题才觉得有道理,要不然答案就不是唯一的啦。

517#
发表于 2007-10-27 03:43:00 | 只看该作者

姐妹们都加油,再讨论一道题

GWD-10-Q29:
    

Smithtown University’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted.  This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job.  On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

 Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

  1. Smithtown University’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.

  2. This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.

  3. This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.

  4. The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown  University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.

  5. More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.

 这道题有争议A,C,偶上去就选了C,看了半天居然看不到A的争议在那里, 晕!


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-10-27 3:44:32编辑过]
518#
发表于 2007-10-27 05:43:00 | 只看该作者

MM我觉得选A哦.

题干说"S大学的这些给学校融资的人尽管从他们联络的人中的80%都拿到了捐款, 但并不说明这些融资人员工作做的好. 相反的, 因为他们只跟那些以前曾经给别的学校捐过款的人联系, 而这些人是比较容易被说服捐款的(毕竟以前他们有给人家捐款的经历嘛).实际上就说这帮融资人做事情投机取巧, 没有充分扩大潜在的捐款人.

A. 说S大学的人们在联系捐款人的时候没有像其他大学的融资人员费那么多力.

C. 说S大学今年获得的捐款是人家主动自己来的, 不是那些融资人联系的.

这题目主要是说融资工作人员工作投机取巧, 没有加强联系扩大潜在的donors. 所以我觉得A更好. C是迷惑选项.

519#
发表于 2007-10-27 06:08:00 | 只看该作者

since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort. 是说:因为这些愿意捐款的人大部分是哪些过去捐过款的人,good fund-rasier 因该坚持不懈地努力争取哪些不愿意捐款的人来扩大donor base. high success rate 显示没有充分游说。(也就是说 fund-raiser没有努力)

A,跟其他大学相比我觉得跟题目的结论没有关系

Smithtown University’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people. 

洋洋,能翻译一下A吗 

520#
发表于 2007-10-27 08:49:00 | 只看该作者

(C)+1【assumption是support题型的细分支系,这题就有点类似asumption题型】

原文:在有联系而最终获得捐款的人数比例达到80%,这样并非成功表现,相反因为捐款人行为有惯性,这个成功率就导致不去发掘优质潜在捐款人,由此表明工作没有深入开展。——原文的方向是要批判学校没有努力募捐

这里的assumption是:来捐款的人大部分都是曾经捐款的人。(回头看看原文,就会发现缺了这个桥梁——没有指出捐款者是否从前就捐款)

A)好象语法题哦,,,该学校联系“从前没有捐款的潜在善丈人翁”跟联系“曾在其他学校捐款的惯性捐款人”的频率差无几——跟原文意思相违背

C)捐款者是不请自来,而他们多数都是从前就捐款的人——出于惯性,不是学校努力募捐的成果。

然后这题还有一个陷阱:原文的80%是指有联系的人数比例,跟C的most骤看似矛盾,但是想清楚了,就没有问题的,就像做数学:是两个有交集的圆饼,一个是联系人名单的80%,一个是最终捐款人名单的大部分。

嗯,我就是这样理解咯,不知道是否误导的说


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-10-27 8:50:58编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-1 16:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部