ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1542|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

11OG 32 求教!~~

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-9-6 00:21:00 | 只看该作者

11OG 32 求教!~~

32. The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand they are trying to meet. The only cyclists seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers. Therefore, innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purposes of competition in bicycle races.

Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion on the previous page?

(A)         The market for cheap, traditional bicycles cannot expand unless the market for high-performance competition bicycles expands.

(B)         High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of technological innovations developed in small workshops than as a result of technological innovations developed in major manufacturing concerns.

(C)        Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recognized as standard for purposes of competition.

(D)        The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily from their desire to manufacture a product that can be sold without being altered to suit different national markets.

(E)         The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design.      

Argument Construction

Situation . Bicycle racers are the only consumers willing to pay for innovations in bicycle technology. Manufacturers therefore limit innovation to the standards established for competitive bicycle racing.

Reasoning What is being assumed in this argument? This argument implies a connection between what bicycle racers want and what bicycle manufacturers make. The passage states that only racers are interested in innovation and willing to pay for it. Bicycle manufacturers have determined it is not worthwhile to produce innovative bicycles that do not meet official standards. What is the implied interaction? It is reasonable to assume that racers must not be interested in buying models that, while innovative, do not meet official standards for racing; they will pay only for those innovations that are acceptable in competition.

A       The argument concerns innovation in bicycle technology. It is not about the entire market for all bicycles, so no assumption is made about traditional bicycles.

B        The passage does not discuss where the best innovations are likely to be created, so no assumption about small workshops versus large manufacturers is made.

C        Correct. This statement properly identifies the conclusion's underlying assumption that bicycle racers do not buy bicycles they cannot use for racing.

D        The passage does not discuss different national markets; no assumption can be made about them.

E        The passage does not indicate what the authorities do or do not know; this statement is extraneous to the passage and cannot be assumed.

537

The correct answer is C.

很疑惑的问~~为什么选C??没搞清楚~~大家做此题时怎么理解的?欢迎讨论!:)


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-9-8 0:31:13编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2007-9-6 00:44:00 | 只看该作者

同问, 郁闷, 本来对逻辑还看好的,可做题错那么多

这题我开始做的时候选E,

但看了答案后觉得C有道理. C 是确定LIMITED 的范围:  standard for purposes of competition. 前提中并没有界定这个范围就下了结论.

选E有些发散思维了. 我当初想innovation LIMITED的原因是high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design. 但这个原因和题目假设的结果不挈合. 和for purposes of competition in bicycle races 无关.

不知道说清楚没有哦.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-9-6 01:13:00 | 只看该作者
我刚开始也选的E,我再看看~~郁闷~~现在不知道怎么复习逻辑了~~错题太多:(
地板
发表于 2007-9-6 01:21:00 | 只看该作者
我只好告诉自己不急,悠着点分析每道题
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-9-8 00:57:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用coldfire6在2007-9-6 0:44:00的发言:

同问, 郁闷, 本来对逻辑还看好的,可做题错那么多

这题我开始做的时候选E,

但看了答案后觉得C有道理. C 是确定LIMITED 的范围:  standard for purposes of competition. 前提中并没有界定这个范围就下了结论.

选E有些发散思维了. 我当初想innovation LIMITED的原因是high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design. 但这个原因和题目假设的结果不挈合. 和for purposes of competition in bicycle races 无关.

不知道说清楚没有哦.

我也是反复看了解释才模模糊糊的感觉C是有理由正确的,但对推理过程很不解~~不是很清晰阿!~~惆怅!欢迎大家继续讨论!~~

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-9-10 23:30:00 | 只看该作者
up~~~
7#
发表于 2008-3-25 17:39:00 | 只看该作者
推理过程是这样的,首先只有赛手才关心自行车的技术创新,参赛用的自行车是受参赛标准限值的,而赛手购买赛车是受赛车竞赛标准限制的,因为超出限制的自行车无法参赛,所以赛手对INOVATION的要求也没有那么高,这样的话所有人的需求都是很普通的需求
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-2-25 02:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部