ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: Isabel221
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教PREP-57和58.请NN帮忙! 搜不到的啊

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2015-4-7 20:44:12 | 只看该作者
platobungee 发表于 2007-8-30 01:04
两个题目是一样的,我帮你讲个稍难点的吧,然后57题你自己做Roland说:国内90%的人都说自己认识某个失业的 ...

同意!               
22#
发表于 2015-5-19 20:18:29 | 只看该作者
贴一个RON的解释:

2nd question:

the correct answer to this problem should be (b).

* sharon cites a statistic that applies on a broad scale -- she's quoting an unemployment rate, which must apply over an extremely broad geographical area (probably nationwide).
* she then moves to a statement about individual people, assuming that the same percentages that apply on a nationwide basis must therefore apply to each individual.

if there are large variations in unemployment rates across different geographical areas, then this argument doesn't hold, since the number of unemployed people known by different individuals in different areas will vary wildly. therefore, sharon must assume that there are NO such large variations.

引用lawyer:DENIAL TEST将选项取非,原文结论不成立,则为正确选项
assumption不能以己之矛攻己之盾
23#
发表于 2015-5-19 20:28:40 | 只看该作者
BEFORE looking at the answer choices, let's consider possible assumptions:

In this case, Sharon is assuming that all people know a sample population of workers that are equally likely to suffer 5% unemployment. If this were not the case, Sharon's conclusion crumbles.

As answer choice B is a restatement of the assumption I recognized, it is the best answer. However, I will use the negation test with choice B to ensure that I have not been careless.

Original b) unemployment is not normally concentrated in geographically isolated segments of populations

Negated b) unemployment IS normally concentrated in geographically isolated segments of population

If unemployment were concentrated in geographically isolated segments of populations, then randomly selected individuals would not have an equivalent chance(和上面RON的红色部分一个意思) of knowing an unemployed person. Instead, based on geographic factors, some individuals would be much more likely to know unemployed workers than would other individuals. In this case, Sharon's conclusion crumbles.

The correct answer is B.

ps. I would identify this as a "fill in the logic gap" assumption type. The unstated assumption helps explain how we get from the premises (5% unemployment, 90% people know someone unemployed) to the conclusion (a person who knows 50 workers will most likely know at least one unemployed worker)
24#
发表于 2015-7-2 11:30:44 | 只看该作者
顶一下2楼牛牛,太感谢了。
25#
发表于 2015-11-26 20:07:18 | 只看该作者
感谢呀
26#
发表于 2016-3-9 12:16:04 | 只看该作者
sharon认为所有人都认识一群失业率大约为5%的人/朋友, 这就是sharon的assumption. 答案B符合这一假设,失业率并不是集中在某个地域。 如果B选项是 unemployment IS normally concentrated. 那么就不是所有人都认识一群失业率为5%的人群了。
27#
发表于 2016-6-23 14:17:18 | 只看该作者
感谢分享
28#
发表于 2017-1-19 17:53:12 | 只看该作者
明白多了
29#
发表于 2017-2-5 12:27:51 | 只看该作者
完全读不懂题
30#
发表于 2017-3-24 10:43:59 | 只看该作者
感谢dxfy3572的分享!终于懂了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-20 01:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部