- UID
- 1027169
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2014-7-16
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
BEFORE looking at the answer choices, let's consider possible assumptions:
In this case, Sharon is assuming that all people know a sample population of workers that are equally likely to suffer 5% unemployment. If this were not the case, Sharon's conclusion crumbles.
As answer choice B is a restatement of the assumption I recognized, it is the best answer. However, I will use the negation test with choice B to ensure that I have not been careless.
Original b) unemployment is not normally concentrated in geographically isolated segments of populations
Negated b) unemployment IS normally concentrated in geographically isolated segments of population
If unemployment were concentrated in geographically isolated segments of populations, then randomly selected individuals would not have an equivalent chance(和上面RON的红色部分一个意思) of knowing an unemployed person. Instead, based on geographic factors, some individuals would be much more likely to know unemployed workers than would other individuals. In this case, Sharon's conclusion crumbles.
The correct answer is B.
ps. I would identify this as a "fill in the logic gap" assumption type. The unstated assumption helps explain how we get from the premises (5% unemployment, 90% people know someone unemployed) to the conclusion (a person who knows 50 workers will most likely know at least one unemployed worker) |
|