ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

"Life expectancy" is the average age at death of the entire live-born population. In the middle of the nineteenth century, life expectancy in North America was 40 years, whereas now it is nearly 80 years. Thus, in those days, people must have been considered old at an age that we now consider the prime of life.

Which of the following, if true, undermines the argument above?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1504|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG-11th 3

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-8-15 11:07:00 | 只看该作者

OG-11th 3

请问OG11TH中CR的第三题,D选项OG给的解释是support,想来想去,不知为何,求达人指教:)

"Life expectancy" is the average age at death of the entire live-born population. In the middle of the nineteenth

century, life expectancy in North America was 40 years, wherreas now it is nearly 80 years. Thus, in those days,

people must have been considered old at an age that we now consider the prime of life.

Which of the following , if true, undermines the argument above?

A. In the middle of nineteenth century, the population of North America was significantly smaller than it is today.

B. Most of the gains in life expectancy in the last 150 years have come from reduction in the number of infants

who die in their first year life.

C. Many of the people who live to an advanced age today do so only because of medical technology that was

unknown in the nineteenth century.

D. The propotion of people who die in their seventies is significantly smaller today than is the proportiion of people

who die in their eighties.

E. More people in the middle of the nineteenth century engaged regularly in vigorous physical activity than do so

today.

先谢!


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-8-15 11:45:09编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-14 18:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部