|
非常同意VIVIAN的建议.昨天做GWD10后半部和GWD8 (错12/15,一年前错20/19),终于发现自己确实进步了.语法部分从过去错平均10到13个到现在5到6个,能清楚的分清句子结构和ETS要考的知识点(虽然经常落入ETS的陷阱,还需更熟练掌握各个知识点才行,要做到反过来掉过去都认识,都能不被陷阱迷惑.)逻辑部分有进步,但不知道是否因为过去做过2遍.感觉思路比过去清晰.能迅速排除2到3个无关选项,可是会在最后两个拿不定,我人为是自己还没有贴近ETS的思路,要继续总结OG. 最近天天总结OG感觉收获很大,可惜认识太晚,到现在还没有从头到尾看完过OG. 我这次看解释体会到很多非固定搭配的知识点,SC的突破还是要从逻辑意思上滤一遍,最后再选答案.还有在做题时不要因为时间不够就偷工减料只读化纤部分,一定要读完后面,尤其是末尾的小短语,小从句之类的,往往哪暗藏险境. 这里有一个逻辑看不懂: Q40. Press Secretary: Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts. But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?
- Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
- The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.
- The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
- The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
- Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.
Answer :B |