ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2722|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教:GWD-8-Q10: 为什么E是削弱,B是加强?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-8-8 11:31:00 | 只看该作者

请教:GWD-8-Q10: 为什么E是削弱,B是加强?


    

请教:GWD-8-Q10: 为什么E是削弱,B是加强?谢谢!


GWD-8-Q10:


    

Which
of the following, if true, would most clearly serve to weaken the
author’s claim about what constitutes a reasonable yardstick for measuring
patent quality?


    

 


    

A.
It is more difficult to have an article accepted for publication in the
technical literature of the semiconductor industry than it is in the technical
literature of most other industries
加强


    

B.
Many of the highest-quality semiconductor patents are cited numerous times in
the technical literature
加强


    

C.
It is difficult for someone not familiar with the technical literature to
recognize what constitutes an innovative semiconductor patent
无关


    

D.
There were more citations made per semiconductor patent in the technical
literature in the 1970’s
than in the 1980’s
加强


    

E. Low-quality patents tend to be
discussed in the technical literature as frequently as high-quality patents.
削弱


    

        

Though patent
            
quality is a
difficult notion

            
to measure, the number of
            
times a patent is cited
in

            
the
technical literature is

            
a reasonable yardstick, and
            
citations
per

            
semiconductor
            
patent did decline during
            
the 1980’s.


    

沙发
发表于 2007-8-8 11:34:00 | 只看该作者
文中说引用的次数来反映了quality的不同,E说无论好还是坏,都一样会被引用,所以引用不能作为一个评价质量的标准,因而削弱
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-8 17:29:00 | 只看该作者
明白了,谢谢!
地板
发表于 2009-9-6 17:57:00 | 只看该作者
哦,这样啊
5#
发表于 2010-5-14 22:12:56 | 只看该作者
ding
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-26 13:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部