GWD7-Q38答案究竟是E还是B?

yoyo88

GWD7-Q38:   evaluation

Journalist:  Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron has long been popular in the state, and he has often talked about running for governor, but he has never run.  However, we have just learned that Bergeron has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy by submitting a detailed list of his current financial holdings to the election commission.  So, it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year.

 

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the journalist’s argument?

(B.E爭議題,答案為B, 我覺得E對)

1. Has anybody else who has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for the upcoming election reported greater financial holdings than Bergeron?[C1] 

2. Is submitting a list of holdings the only way to fulfill the election commission’s financial disclosure requirements?[C2] 

3. Did the information recently obtained by the journalists come directly from the election commission?

4. Have Bergeron’s financial holdings increased in value in recent years[C3] ?

5. Had Bergeron also fulfilled the financial disclosure requirements for candidacy before any previous gubernatorial [C4] elections?[C5] 

---

 看了以前的帖子，好像没有定论，现在有哪位NN能给个准确答复啊？谢谢先 ：）

addy

不是NN

倾向选E

easylau

我手上的参考答案就是E呀

yoyo88

谢谢大家好心的解答。GWD的答案太多版本，我都不知道哪个是最准确的。

fk305301

我感觉B不对，但是E也不对，郁闷，麽的选了才选的E  NN解释下！

vivian_chi

菜鸟：倾向b,题目说他always talked but never run，并没有说过他以前也做过实际行动，只说他以前总是说，这样的话，e就不对的了。

robbiexu

如果Arnold Bergeron以前提交了财务证明，但是显然他从没有正式参选过，故就算今年他真的提交了财务证明，也无法判断他今年会否参选governor. 故Jounalist的结论和判断"He's likely to be a candidate this year"不正确。 --->  既说明E最能够帮助判别Jounalist的论断。

phenomena

我觉得这道题还是要选B

E选项：Arnold既然从来没有参加过竞选，那么如果他以前也递交过financial list的话，这次即便递交就不能表明他一定会参选；反之，如果他以前没有递交过financial list, 则与这次的事件毫无关联。回答这个问题对确认他是否会参选没有帮助

再看B，如果递交financial list是满足参选的必须条件：财务曝光，那么Arnold这次递交行为是参选的重要一步，支持记者的结论。

minzhenyuan

请大家解释一下

这个GWD的版本是什么？

我手里的31套和TN24套的2个版本都和LZ的GWD7-Q38都不一样！

elinyang

这题我也很迷惑..