求助GWD30-19

mimixiaxia

UP

mimixiaxia

Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do.  Since, even after treatment, people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future, any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treated for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job.

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument above?

 

1. Some companies place employees who are being treated for drinking problems in residential programs and allow them several weeks of paid sick leave.
2. Many accidents in the workplace are the result of errors by employees who do not hold safety-sensitive jobs.
3. Workers who would permanently lose their jobs if they sought treatment for a drinking problem try instead to conceal their problem and continue working for as long as possible.
4. People who hold safety-sensitive jobs are subject to stresses that can exacerbate any personal problems they may have, including drinking problems.
5. Some industrial accidents are caused by equipment failure rather than by employee error.

选C,B是无关选项.原文认为解决问题的方法是禁止那些有酗酒问题的人继续在这个岗位上工作.
如果这是一道假设题,那答案就是:老板能把这些有问题的人找出来------类似题目大家应该做的很多了
取非假设就是老板找不到有问题的人,C就表明了那些有问题的人隐藏了自己的问题,这样老板就没办法找到他们,自然就削弱了结论

ilovecushi

以下是引用s7s7在2007-6-14 13:05:00的发言：

要安全，酗酒者不能做A工作

削弱：

B工作才不安全。

agree! choose B

although C looks very related, but look at the questions, it asks for the choice that most seriously undermines the argument

what is the argument? its  any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treated for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job.

so B directly undermine the argument..

personal opinion..

eileenmu木

D怎么排除

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-3-24 22:13:54编辑过]

qqqsunny

    

有酗酒问题的一些人在安全敏感工作比没有酗酒问题的人发生工业事故更加普遍。因为即使经过治疗，将来这些人也比没有酗酒问题的人更容易酗酒，所以雇主如果要避免发生事故的风险，就应该将曾经有酗酒问题的人赶出安全敏感工作。

    

问削弱：

    

A,
一些公司将曾经酗酒的问题员工放入住宿制项目中，并且允许他们请几周的病假
        （无关）

    

B,
许多事故都由没有在安全敏感工作的员工引起的
        （无关选项，很容易误选成B，会误把把题目中的结论变成要减少风险，而实际上因为Since的关系，黄的话是原因，后面整段蓝的推论）

    

C,
许多工人因为怕因为酗酒问题而导致永远失去工作，所以隐瞒他们曾经酗酒的情况，尽量工作的更久。（直接削弱结论，隔断目标和方案的联系）

    

D,
在安全敏感工作上的人遭受着压力会使他们的个人问题加剧，包括酗酒
        （支持结论）

    

E,
许多事故都是由于设备故障而不是人为错误。（无关）

    

请nn指正……

russellguo

以下是引用mimixiaxia在2007-8-30 18:17:00的发言：

Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do.  Since, even after treatment, people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future, any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treated for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job.

 

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument above?

 

 

1. Some companies place employees who are being treated for drinking problems in residential programs and allow them several weeks of paid sick leave.
2. Many accidents in the workplace are the result of errors by employees who do not hold safety-sensitive jobs.
3. Workers who would permanently lose their jobs if they sought treatment for a drinking problem try instead to conceal their problem and continue working for as long as possible.
4. People who hold safety-sensitive jobs are subject to stresses that can exacerbate any personal problems they may have, including drinking problems.
5. Some industrial accidents are caused by equipment failure rather than by employee error.

选C,B是无关选项.原文认为解决问题的方法是禁止那些有酗酒问题的人继续在这个岗位上工作.
如果这是一道假设题,那答案就是:老板能把这些有问题的人找出来------类似题目大家应该做的很多了
取非假设就是老板找不到有问题的人,C就表明了那些有问题的人隐藏了自己的问题,这样老板就没办法找到他们,自然就削弱了结论

说的非常清晰，谢谢！

rorarora

Up

夜凉如水

同楼主，因因果导致，选择了D

夜凉如水

Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do.  Since, even after treatment, people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future, any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treated for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument above?

关键字，喝酒，工作事故概率

A. Some companies place employees who are being treated for drinking problems in residential programs and allow them several weeks of paid sick leave.无关
B. Many accidents in the workplace are the result of errors by employees who do not hold safety-sensitive jobs.不能削弱结论，即使B说的是事实，那么颁布新规定，可以降低事故概率，即使对于总的事故概率来说这种降低微不足道。但是，确实降低了，那么此选项不能削弱
C. Workers who would permanently lose their jobs if they sought treatment for a drinking problem try instead to conceal their problem and continue working for as long as possible.正确。工人隐瞒情况，所以规定达不到预期目的。
D. eople who hold safety-sensitive jobs are subject to stresses that can exacerbate any personal problems they may have, including drinking problems.想通了，这个选项也不能削弱。不管后来工人有没有喝酒，至少规定的实习，排除了现有危险因素，降低了事故概率。
E. Some industrial accidents are caused by equipment failure rather than by employee error.无关

jiaojicao

up