［已解决］ GWD-23-Q39

miffycn

41.: GWD-23-Q39
In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the incidence of smoking-related health problems has risen steadily for the last twenty years.  The health secretary recently proposed a series of laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use in Gandania.  Profits from tobacco sales, however, account for ten percent of Gandania’s annual revenues.  Therefore, Gandania cannot afford to institute the proposed laws.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

１All health care in Gandania is government-funded.
２Implementing the proposed laws is not likely to cause a significant increase in the amount of tobacco Gandania exports.
３The percentage of revenue Gandania receives from tobacco sales has remained steady in recent years.
４Profits from tobacco sales far surpass any other single source of revenue for the Gandanian government.
５No government official in Gandania has ever previously proposed laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use.

答案选Ａ我选Ｂ，不太明白　请NN explain !!

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-5-3 9:27:31编辑过]

miffycn

没有人回答....

gonghao

When the governement of G pay for the health problem itself, the governement is still getting the profit from its tobacco sales.

When the governement of G save money from the health problem , the governement is still lossing the profit from its tobacco sales.

So the answer is A.

B is the result of implementing the policy with increse of the sales in tobacco that would never happen. And it makes no sense on the conlusion.

miffycn

谢谢NN~~~!!!赞~~~!!!

laura466

up