跪求大全2－2题！！！！！！

rockandroll

In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically. Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities.

Each of the following is an assumption made in the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.

(B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air.

(C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London.

(D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable.

(E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area.

是不是A 里面的 almost entirely 这个词用错了？ 请各位大虾解释！！！

pangpangshin

我认为是most major cities错了

原文结论是oter major 范围不同

lewton

同意almost entirely的观点

取非是部分由本地工业引起,则进行控制还是可以减少污染的不能构成削弱 

rockandroll

还是不大懂啊 ！  请解释详细点！！！谢谢！！

yaoshuming

顶

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-4-23 18:38:19编辑过]

gonghao

lewton's explaination does work.

rockandroll

确实！ 只能说是一个影响，不能说是 ENTIRELY