ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2223|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-2-17

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-4-2 22:30:00 | 只看该作者

gwd-2-17

Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides.  New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt.  Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

 

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

 

  1. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
  2. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
  3. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
  4. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
  5. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?

   Answer: e

我觉得d更好吧~~

沙发
发表于 2007-4-2 23:37:00 | 只看该作者
In determining the impact on company profits  D中考虑了两种方法最终preserve the hide 的效果是否一样,也就是说质量是否一样,若不一样可能影响销量,减少profit    E 选项内容研究两者的化学成分 和利润无关  我的话讲完了
板凳
发表于 2007-4-3 02:08:00 | 只看该作者

由试剂的化学成分不能直接架桥说明试剂所保护的产品(皮革)销量 E wrong

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2007-4-3 14:14:00 | 只看该作者

可是我觉得e中也是考虑到了effective的对比呀,和d的思路是差不多的吧?

再请教~~~

5#
发表于 2007-4-3 23:26:00 | 只看该作者

D: the chemical properties (that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides   )Are the same as those (that make common salt an effective means for doing so) ,改成肯定句在感觉一下,D主要是在考察成分是不是一样,而是不是一样并不重要,结果才重要,也许成分不同但效果相同,馒头,米饭,成分不同,只要吃了不饿就行,管他是哪个?

 

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-28 05:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部