ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1332|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全1-12,未见有人讨论

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-3-14 11:47:00 | 只看该作者

大全1-12,未见有人讨论

大全1-12

Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of paint that lie buried beneath the surface layers of old paintings. They claim, for example, that additional mountainous scenery once appeared in Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa, which was later painted over. Skeptics reply to these claims, however, that X-ray examinations of the Mona Lisa do not show hidden mountains.

Which of the following, if true, would tend most to weaken the force of the skeptics’ objections?

(A) There is no written or anecdotal record that Leonardo da Vinci ever painted over major areas of his Mona Lisa.

(B) Painters of da Vinci’s time commonly created images of mountainous scenery in the backgrounds of portraits like the Mona Lisa.

(C) No one knows for certain what parts of the Mona Lisa may have been painted by da Vinci’s assistants rather than by da Vinci himself.

(D) Infrared photography of the Mona Lisa has revealed no trace of hidden mountainous scenery.E

(E) Analysis relying on X-rays only has the capacity to detect lead-based white pigments in layers of paint beneath a painting’s surface layers.

 

不明白

 

沙发
发表于 2007-3-14 12:25:00 | 只看该作者

E吧

说明这个X光的检测并不正确,怀疑者没有理由去怀疑

表层在底层之上,电脑技术说,那个山是后来画上去的

怀疑者说,X光没有发现隐藏的山,但是X光没发现不代表不存在

如果底层上的山和表层上的山重合,X光是没有用的,只要表层有,底层的影像会被表层遮盖,从而发现不了。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 20:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部