ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1147|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教一题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-2-5 14:39:00 | 只看该作者

请教一题

不太明白题干第一句什么意思,尤其是to what end are all the arts of life,请指教,谢谢!

 

If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.

Which one of the following is an assumption made by the author of the passage?

(A) The arts of life have no useful end.

(B) The artificial is not better than the natural.

(C) Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature.

(D) The injunction to follow nature should not be violated.

(E) The arts of life are indirect means of following nature.

答案C

沙发
发表于 2007-2-5 21:59:00 | 只看该作者

我个人猜测了下:

如果说艺术的东西不如自然的东西,那么所有生命的艺术将走向一个什么样的终点呢? 挖东西.....穿衣,这些都是违背了自然间的连接......

也就是说我们不该认为艺术的没用,我们穿衣服等等都算作艺术的东西,如果光强调自然,那我们就不该穿衣服,这个后果很不堪设想.

所以,题目中暗含了个假设就是这些作者所说到的行为都是比自然的东西好的.

 

本人语文也很烂,谈点个人感觉,有错请NN指正

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 02:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部